Korey, try 'hg status'. It would list the set of files that are not being
tracked. May be there is some file that should be committed and has not
been.
--
Nilay
On Thu, 9 Jun 2011, Korey Sewell wrote:
My local repo has this at the tip:
hg tip
changeset: 8342:77d12d8f7971
tag: tip
user: Korey Sewell <ksew...@umich.edu>
date: Thu Jun 09 01:34:06 2011 -0400
summary: sparc: compilation fixes for inorder
and the "hg outgoing" tab says nothing outstanding.
I have not tried this on zizzer yet, but that is the next step.
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Steve Reinhardt <ste...@gmail.com> wrote:
It fails for me... are you sure you've pushed everything? Have you
tried it on zizzer?
Steve
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Korey Sewell <ksew...@umich.edu> wrote:
ok, this is a bit wierd.
I'm running all the tests locally and they are passing ...
Even the O3 one:
build/SPARC_SE/tests/opt/quick/40.m5threads-test-atomic/sparc/linux/o3-timing-mp
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Korey Sewell <ksew...@umich.edu> wrote:
Yup, that's me. I will update the stats for the simple cpus. I thought I
had caught the branchTarget() error before, but apparently not.
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Steve Reinhardt <ste...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Looks like all the SPARC tests failed. The two o3-timing ones have
this
error:
panic: StaticInst::branchTarget() called on instruction that is not a
PC-relative branch.
[branchTarget:build/SPARC_SE/cpu/static_inst.cc, line 99]
The others seem to have run correctly, but have stats differences like
this:
system.cpu.num_conditional_control_insts 0 774
774 +9999.00%
system.cpu.num_func_calls 0 146 146
+9999.00%
I'm guessing this is from Korey's recent SPARC change...
Steve
_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
gem5-dev@m5sim.org
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
