Korey, try 'hg status'. It would list the set of files that are not being tracked. May be there is some file that should be committed and has not been.


On Thu, 9 Jun 2011, Korey Sewell wrote:

My local repo has this at the tip:
hg tip
changeset:   8342:77d12d8f7971
tag:         tip
user:        Korey Sewell <ksew...@umich.edu>
date:        Thu Jun 09 01:34:06 2011 -0400
summary:     sparc: compilation fixes for inorder

and the "hg outgoing" tab says nothing outstanding.

I have not tried this on zizzer yet, but that is the next step.

On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Steve Reinhardt <ste...@gmail.com> wrote:

It fails for me... are you sure you've pushed everything?  Have you
tried it on zizzer?


On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Korey Sewell <ksew...@umich.edu> wrote:
ok, this is a bit wierd.

I'm running all the tests locally and they are passing ...

Even the O3 one:


On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Korey Sewell <ksew...@umich.edu> wrote:

Yup, that's me. I will update the stats for the simple cpus. I thought I
had caught the branchTarget() error before, but apparently not.

On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Steve Reinhardt <ste...@gmail.com>

Looks like all the SPARC tests failed.  The two o3-timing ones have

panic: StaticInst::branchTarget() called on instruction that is not a
PC-relative branch.
[branchTarget:build/SPARC_SE/cpu/static_inst.cc, line 99]

The others seem to have run correctly, but have stats differences like

 system.cpu.num_conditional_control_insts          0        774
 774  +9999.00%
 system.cpu.num_func_calls               0        146        146

I'm guessing this is from Korey's recent SPARC change...


gem5-dev mailing list

Reply via email to