thanks for reply, but i am using simsmall only On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Dawei Wang <[email protected]>wrote:
> Hello, Biswabandan > > If you use M5 to simulate the PARSEC in detailed mode, it will take very > long time. For canneal 4 cores simulation with simlarge input size, the > simulation may last more than 30 hours. Just wait and see. > > Dawei > > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Message: 1 >> Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 07:53:10 +0530 >> From: biswabandan panda <[email protected]> >> To: M5 users mailing list <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [gem5-users] how long it takes for simulation of PARSEC >> benchmarks >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" >> >> it has been 20 hrs & still running? >> >> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:11 PM, biswabandan panda <[email protected] >> >wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > i was running PARSEC benchmarks like bodytrack, canneal, >> > streamcluster in the ROI region after checkpoint with simsmall , but >> > it was running from last 9 hrs? i just want to confirm whether it's ok >> or >> > something is wrong somewhere? >> > -- >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> -- >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: < >> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/gem5-users/attachments/20110614/eddd030a/attachment-0001.html >> > >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 2 >> Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 08:04:34 +0530 >> From: biswabandan panda <[email protected]> >> To: M5 users mailing list <[email protected]> >> Subject: [gem5-users] PARSEC (canneal) benchmark looping for specified >> instructions? >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" >> >> Hi, >> i was running a fresh copy of gem5, wit no changes in any part of >> the code, i ran the canneal benchmark from PARSEC, it was still running >> for >> more than 20 hours. Therefore i put the debug flags for Cache and ran it >> again. Here is a snapshot of the trace which was coming from last 10 mins >> or >> so. I am using O3 core with GHB prefetcher turned on. Any ideas why it is >> happening like this, especially PARSEC users. PLz do reply >> >> 2303711476500: system.cpu0.icache: ReadReq (ifetch) 6fc0 hit >> 2303711476500: system.cpu0.dcache: ReadReq 1f54f838 hit >> 2303711476500: system.cpu0.dcache: ReadReq 1f54f840 hit >> 2303711476500: system.cpu0.dcache: ReadReq 1f54f848 hit >> 2303711477000: system.cpu0.dcache: ReadReq 1f54f850 hit >> 2303711477000: system.cpu0.dcache: ReadReq 1f54f858 hit >> 2303711477000: system.cpu0.dcache: ReadReq 1f54f860 hit >> 2303711477000: system.cpu0.dcache: ReadReq 1f54f868 hit >> 2303711478000: system.cpu0.dcache: ReadReq 1f54f870 hit >> 2303711478500: system.cpu0.icache: ReadReq (ifetch) 4840 hit >> 2303711478500: system.cpu0.dcache: ReadReq 1f54f878 hit >> 2303711478500: system.cpu0.dcache: ReadReq 1f54f880 hit >> 2303711478500: system.cpu0.dcache: ReadReq 1f54f888 hit >> 2303711478500: system.cpu0.dcache: ReadReq 1f54f890 hit >> 2303711479000: system.cpu0.dcache: ReadReq 1f54f898 hit >> 2303711486000: system.cpu0.dcache: ReadReq 1f54f8c0 hit >> 2303711486000: system.cpu0.dcache: ReadReq 1f54f8c8 hit >> 2303711486000: system.cpu0.dcache: ReadReq 1f54f8e8 hit >> 2303711486000: system.cpu0.dcache: ReadReq 1f54f8e0 hit >> 2303711486500: system.cpu0.dcache: ReadReq 1f54f8d8 hit >> 2303711486500: system.cpu0.dcache: ReadReq 1f54f8d0 hit >> 2303711500500: system.cpu0.icache: ReadReq (ifetch) 4880 hit >> 2303711519000: system.cpu0.icache: ReadReq (ifetch) 312700 hit >> > > _______________________________________________ > gem5-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users > -- *thanks®ards * *BISWABANDAN PANDA* *M.S.(RESEARCH SCHOLAR)* *RISE LAB* *IIT MADRAS* http://www.cse.iitm.ac.in/~biswa/
_______________________________________________ gem5-users mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
