yeah it may, what kind of stream prefetcher u have used like the latest ones which are adaptive in nature . Actually i have implemented a stream prefetcher based on recent papers from data prefetching championship but i have used physical addresses instead of virtual . If u don't mind could u send me the code so that i ll try with my set up and i ll get back to u or tell me the paper which u have implemented?
Next thing is it's for Last Level Cache or for all? On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 4:34 PM, zhanglunkai <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all,**** > > ** ** > > I have implemented a stream prefetcher in m5, and run the simulation in SE > mode. However, the prefetcher seems to perform much better than previous > works’ statistics (these work usually uses trace simulators). For example, > cfp2000.art gives almost no miss in the whole simulation. And I am wondering > why this is happening …**** > > ** ** > > Any suggestions?**** > > Is SE mode using virtual addresses? And because these virtual addresses are > continuous without interrupts such as different pages in FS mode, the stream > prefetcher is more likely to get good performance?**** > > ** ** > > Thanks a lot in advance!**** > > ** ** > > Yours,**** > > Lunkai**** > > _______________________________________________ > gem5-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users > -- *thanks®ards * *BISWABANDAN PANDA* *M.S.(RESEARCH SCHOLAR)* *RISE LAB* *IIT MADRAS* http://www.cse.iitm.ac.in/~biswa/
_______________________________________________ gem5-users mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
