I think the idea was marking the variable as used and thus disabling the unused warning. I can see your argument however. If you're motivated to change it everywhere I wouldn't object.
Ali On Jan 18, 2012, at 1:32 PM, Paul Rosenfeld wrote: > I was perusing the code and I stumbled on this little tidbit: > > #define M5_VAR_USED __attribute__((unused)) > > Does it seem confusing to anyone else that the macro name implies that the > variable is used, but then the definition tells gcc that probably the > variable will be unused? > > I am just curious if I'm missing something here. > > Thanks, > Paul > _______________________________________________ > gem5-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users _______________________________________________ gem5-users mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
