So, with 8613:712d8bf07020 you got and IPC of 1.54, and with some version
near 8944:d062cc7a8bdf, you get an ipc of 0.093. Which CPU type are you
using?
--
Nilay
On Sat, 14 Apr 2012, Mahmood Naderan wrote:
The previous release is:
changeset: 8613:712d8bf07020
tag: tip
user: Nilay Vaish<[email protected]>
date: Sat Nov 05 15:32:23 2011 -0500
summary: Tests: Update stats due to addition of fence microop
And the IPC is 1.541534
However for the new release, I am not able to find the head:
mahmood@tiger:gem5$ hg head
abort: requirement 'dotencode' not supported!
On 4/14/12, Nilay Vaish <[email protected]> wrote:
How much is the difference and which versions of gem5 are you talking
about?
--
Nilay
On Sat, 14 Apr 2012, Mahmood Naderan wrote:
Hi,
In the new version, I see that the IPC of h264 (with sss input) is
very very low. However with the previous releases, this value is fine
and acceptable.
Do you know how can I find the bottleneck? Which stat value shows the
weired behaviour?
ISA = x86
-F = 50,000,000
--maxtick = 10,000,000,000
L1 = 32kB, 4
L2 = 2MB, 16
the IPC obtained is 0.093432
Have you faced such result? Please let me know
--
// Naderan *Mahmood;
_______________________________________________
gem5-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
_______________________________________________
gem5-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
--
--
// Naderan *Mahmood;
_______________________________________________
gem5-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
_______________________________________________
gem5-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
