It's now fixed as far as I know, so I've removed that comment. 

Ali


On 24.04.2012 15:01, Steve Reinhardt wrote: 

> Ali's the one that put
that statement on the wiki, so I'll let you work it out with him. 
> I
did notice that 2.0.5 just came out last week. 
> Steve
> 
> On Tue, Apr
24, 2012 at 5:53 AM, Andreas Hansson <[email protected] [18]>
wrote:
> 
>> I've been using swig 2.0.4 since December or so when I
pushed a patch that addressed the outstanding issues. 
>> 
>> I don't
know what the "broken" statement was based on, but since the
aforementioned patch was pushed I've been using 2.0.4 without any issues
on MacOSX, Ubuntu and RHE5. 
>> 
>> Andreas 
>> 
>> FROM:
[email protected] [1] [mailto:[email protected] [2]]
ON BEHALF OF Steve Reinhardt
>> SENT: 23 April 2012 16:04 
>> 
>> TO:
gem5 users mailing list
>> SUBJECT: Re: [gem5-users] Build Error 
>> 
>>
Are you saying that the 2.0.x versions we claim are broken aren't
actually broken? 
>> 
>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:13 AM, Andreas
Hansson <[email protected] [3]> wrote: 
>> 
>> Makes sense to me.
We should also remove the "do not use >2 and above" statement as that
works absolutely fine these days. 
>> 
>> Andreas 
>> 
>> FROM:
[email protected] [4] [mailto:[email protected] [5]]
ON BEHALF OF Ali Saidi
>> SENT: 22 April 2012 02:55 
>> 
>> TO: gem5
users mailing list
>> SUBJECT: Re: [gem5-users] Build Error 
>> 
>>
Should we update the minimum version of swig on the website to 1.3.40?

>> 
>> Ali 
>> 
>> On Apr 19, 2012, at 9:48 AM, Thomas, Amanda J wrote:

>> 
>> You're right, I wasn't installing the updated version of swig
correctly. Now I have and gem5 builds! 
>> 
>> Thank you, 
>> 
>> Amanda

>> 
>> -------------------------
>> 
>> FROM:
[email protected] [6] [[email protected] [7]] on
behalf of Steve Reinhardt [[email protected] [8]]
>> SENT: Wednesday,
April 18, 2012 8:01 PM
>> TO: gem5 users mailing list
>> SUBJECT: Re:
[gem5-users] Build Error 
>> 
>> Are you sure scons is actually using
the version of swig you've installed? I tried to recreate the error and
couldn't. On my system with swig 1.3.40 the SWIG_Python_AddErrorMsg
doesn't even start until line 950, yet somehow in your compile you're
getting an error on that function on line 870. I expect the only thing
that could change that would be if scons is using a different version of
swig than you think it is. 
>> 
>> Steve 
>> 
>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at
4:13 PM, Thomas, Amanda J <[email protected] [9]> wrote: 
>>

>> I deleted the build directory in gem5 and tried to build it again,
but the same error came up. Then I used swig 1.3.40 instead and the same
thing happened again. (Both building gem5.debug since it's faster.)
Nothing seems to change the error. 
>> 
>> -Amanda 
>> 
>>
_______________________________________________
>> gem5-users mailing
list
>> [email protected] [10]
>>
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users [11] 
>> 
>>
_______________________________________________
>> gem5-users mailing
list
>> [email protected] [12]
>>
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users [13] 
>> 
>> --
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are
confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the
contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy
the information in any medium. Thank you. 
>> 
>>
_______________________________________________
>> gem5-users mailing
list
>> [email protected] [14]
>>
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users [15] 
>> 
>> --
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are
confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the
contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy
the information in any medium. Thank you.
>> 
>>
_______________________________________________
>> gem5-users mailing
list
>> [email protected] [16]
>>
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users [17]




Links:
------
[1] mailto:[email protected]
[2]
mailto:[email protected]
[3]
mailto:[email protected]
[4]
mailto:[email protected]
[5]
mailto:[email protected]
[6]
mailto:[email protected]
[7]
mailto:[email protected]
[8] mailto:[email protected]
[9]
mailto:[email protected]
[10]
mailto:[email protected]
[11]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
[12]
mailto:[email protected]
[13]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
[14]
mailto:[email protected]
[15]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
[16]
mailto:[email protected]
[17]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
[18]
mailto:[email protected]
_______________________________________________
gem5-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users

Reply via email to