Hi, Samuel.

Are you using the development version or the stable version of gem5?
I didn't check the stable version, but if you are using the development
version there are files in "gem5/system/arm/simple_bootloader", which will
let you make "boot_emm.arm" bootloader.
Take a look at the Makefile in the directory I mentioned above.

Best,

Kiyeon


On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:04 AM, Samuel Hitz <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Jason,
>
> Since I'm porting an operating system, I'm building my own kernel anyway.
> Is there anything else which speaks against using VExpress_ELT? I used this
> one, since I don't have the required bootloader 'boot_emm.arm'. Do you have
> this bootloader available somewhere?
>
> Best,
>
> Samuel
>
> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Jason Clemons <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Samuel,
>>
>>
>> All the information I have on the platforms I found are from the ARM
>> website:
>>
>> http://infocenter.arm.com/**help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.**
>> doc.set.boards/index.html<http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.set.boards/index.html>
>>
>> Building the kernels can be tricky which is why I agree with Ali.  It is
>> better to go with ready made kernels than trying to configure.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>> Jason
>>
>> Quoting Samuel Hitz <[email protected]>:
>>
>>  Oh and can you point me to the corresponding reference manual. I can't
>>> find
>>> the right one as it seems...
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Samuel
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Samuel Hitz <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>  Hi Jason,
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for your answer. Is there a reason why you recommended the
>>>> VExpress_EMM rather than the VExpress_ELT? I'm asking just out of
>>>> curiosity, since both seem to be fitting.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Samuel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Jason Clemons <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  Samuel,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I recommend using the VExpress_EMM if you want more memory.  It should
>>>>> support up to 2GB.  You will need a different kernel, I have a 3.2
>>>>> kernel
>>>>> at 
>>>>> http://www.eecs.umich.edu/****mevbench/downloads.html<http://www.eecs.umich.edu/**mevbench/downloads.html>
>>>>> <http:/**/www.eecs.umich.edu/mevbench/**downloads.html<http://www.eecs.umich.edu/mevbench/downloads.html>>that
>>>>> I am currently using.  It is my understanding that the Realview
>>>>>
>>>>> platform is based on actual hardware.  If you try to set it to a level
>>>>> above 256 MB without modifying the system you will have problems.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Later,
>>>>>
>>>>> Jason
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Quoting Samuel Hitz <[email protected]>:
>>>>>
>>>>>  Hi there,
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is there a reason to limit the maximal amount of physical memory for
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> RealView Platform to 256MB or can I just set it to e.g. 512MB and it
>>>>>> would
>>>>>> work? If this isn't possible, what must be done in order to raise this
>>>>>> limit?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Samuel
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gem5-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>
_______________________________________________
gem5-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users

Reply via email to