Hi Nathanaël,
So are you saying that everything is predicted correctly, however the check is truly wrong in this case? Thanks, Ali On 27.06.2012 12:03, Nathanaël Prémillieu wrote: > >From what I have understand on the example I have worked on to detect > the bug, the predicted address is computed depending on the flag of the > Call for the thumb bit. But when the check is done, the tempPC is > computed depending on flag of the Return. Thus, if the Call and the > Return are not in the same mode, the _npc of PredPC and tempPC are not > the same. > In my example, tempPC._npc = tempPC._pc + 2 (tumb mode) and Pred._npc = > Pred._pc + 4 > > Nathanaël
_______________________________________________ gem5-users mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
