Thnx Andreas Yup, system is running at GHz. It explains the sim tick counts.
Mann On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 4:02 AM, Andreas Hansson <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi Mann, > > I think you might be confusing accuracy and precision here :). No one, as > far as I know, has tried to make the gem5 models cycle accurate…but I'm > sure you could if you really tried. The models are, however, offering an > arbitrary level of precision based around the notion of an abstract tick. > The default Tick is a pico second, so a system running at a GHz would > advance ticks a thousand at a time. > > I hope that explains it. > > Andreas > > From: Mann Mann <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > Reply-To: gem5 users mailing list <[email protected]<mailto: > [email protected]>> > Date: Monday, 24 September 2012 23:24 > To: gem5-users <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > Subject: [gem5-users] Is GEM5 Cycle accurate? > > Hi all > Is GEM5 Cycle accurate? or their is some internal adjustment. > because whatever simulation I do, ticks always results in multiple of > Thousand. > eg @ tick 304265000, @ tick 302535000 > > -- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are > confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended > recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the > contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the > information in any medium. Thank you. > > _______________________________________________ > gem5-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users >
_______________________________________________ gem5-users mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
