Hi What is the IPC you get from h264? On 2/4/13, Rodrigo Reynolds Ramírez <rodrigo.r...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Hello everyone, > I was using the stable version (f75ee4849c40), I download the version in > development (890fc69ba53c) and only one benckmark does not work. I suppose > this syscall will be supported in future releases. This is the benchmark > that does not work. > 483.xalancbmkfatal: syscall lstat (#6) unimplemented. @ cycle > 1556716000[unimplementedFunc:build/X86/sim/syscall_emul.cc, line 83] > Thanks in advance, Rodrigo > > Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 13:22:56 -0700 > From: yidin...@aggiemail.usu.edu > To: gem5-users@gem5.org > Subject: Re: [gem5-users] Unimplemented Function > > Hi Rodrigo, > > You could fix the "fatal: Out of memory, please increase size of physical > memory." by giving more memory to the simulation, for example 2048MB works > for me. > > -Yiding > > > On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Rodrigo Reynolds Ramírez > <rodrigo.r...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Hi I did everyone explained in http://www.gem5.org/SPEC2006_benchmarks but > not only perlbench has problems, I found 9 benchmarks that report a error. > Specifically I found these errors: > > 400.perlbench, 410.bwaves, 437.leslie3d, 459.GemsFDTD, 481.wrf, > 465.tontofatal: syscall ioctl (#16) unimplemented. @ cycle > 31165000[unimplementedFunc:build/X86/sim/syscall_emul.cc, line 83] > > 483.xalancbmkfatal: syscall lstat (#6) unimplemented. @ cycle > 1556716000[unimplementedFunc:build/X86/sim/syscall_emul.cc, line 83] > > 434.zeusmp, 416.gamessfatal: Out of memory, please increase size of physical > memory. @ cycle 0[allocPhysPages:build/X86/sim/system.cc, line 305] > > That means that 9/29 benchmarks don't work with gem5. > Thanks in advance, Rodrigo > > > Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 11:41:48 -0500 > > From: tao.zhang.0...@gmail.com > To: gem5-users@gem5.org > Subject: Re: [gem5-users] Unimplemented Function > > > > > > > > > Hi Rodrigo, > > > > Yes, SPEC2006 can be run in SE mode definitely. However, perlbench > has some trouble so that it should be skipped. see > http://www.gem5.org/SPEC2006_benchmarks for the detail. > > > > -Tao > > > > On 02/02/2013 11:34 AM, Rodrigo Reynolds Ramírez wrote: > > > > Hello everyone: > > > > I am trying to run the SPEC CPU2006 I compile it using the > toolchain created for x86_64 using crosstool-ng. But I when I > run some benchmarks for example perlbench I got a syscall > error: > > > > > fatal: syscall ioctl (#16) unimplemented. > @ cycle 241952000 > [unimplementedFunc:build/X86/sim/syscall_emul.cc, line > 83] > > > > > Is it possible to run the spec2006 in se.py? > > > > Thanks in advance > Rodrigo > > > _______________________________________________ > gem5-users mailing list > gem5-users@gem5.org > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users > > > > > _______________________________________________ > gem5-users mailing list > gem5-users@gem5.org > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users > > > _______________________________________________ > > gem5-users mailing list > > gem5-users@gem5.org > > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users > > > -- > Ph.D. Candidate, Yiding Han > BRIDGE Lab, ECE Dept.,Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA > E-mail: yidin...@aggiemail.usu.edu, bitc...@gmail.com > > > _______________________________________________ > gem5-users mailing list > gem5-users@gem5.org > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users >
-- Regards, Mahmood _______________________________________________ gem5-users mailing list gem5-users@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
