Hi Guru,
Could you perhaps elaborate on "same results"? Are all stats exactly the same,
or is the output of the program the same? Also, what config script are you
running?
Andreas
From: Guru Prasad <gurup...@buffalo.edu<mailto:gurup...@buffalo.edu>>
Reply-To: gem5 users mailing list
<gem5-users@gem5.org<mailto:gem5-users@gem5.org>>
Date: Thursday, 30 May 2013 18:45
To: "gem5-users@gem5.org<mailto:gem5-users@gem5.org>"
<gem5-users@gem5.org<mailto:gem5-users@gem5.org>>,
"gem5-...@gem5.org<mailto:gem5-...@gem5.org>"
<gem5-...@gem5.org<mailto:gem5-...@gem5.org>>
Subject: [gem5-users] Timing CPU model
I was recently running some tests using the timing CPU model and noticed that
my cpu-bound workload was always producing the same results regardless of the
--clock parameter specified.
I tested this with
--clock=0.1GHz (not sure if floating points work for parameters)
--clock=1GHz
--clock=4GHz
--clock=10GHz
Could anyone explain to me why this is the case? Is there something implicit in
the timing model that I'm not quite grasping?
-- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are
confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient,
please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any
other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any
medium. Thank you.
_______________________________________________
gem5-users mailing list
gem5-users@gem5.org
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
