Thanks Joel, I looked that for comparing the use of each cpu, it seems ok. 
Because I am working with cache policies I also need the ipc as a performance 
metric, now I know that the ipc I am getting are ok. Thanks again
Rodrigo

Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 14:21:57 -0500
From: jthestn...@gmail.com
To: gem5-users@gem5.org
Subject: Re: [gem5-users] Parsec and Alpha

Hi Rodrigo,  It is likely that instructions involved with synchronization will 
affect the absolute instruction counts on cores that wait for other cores (and 
thus, the IPC).  A better metric for analyzing the balance of work between 
cores is the mix of instructions that they commit (e.g. integer, floating 
point, control, etc.).  Depending on which core type (atomic, timing, O3, 
inorder) you're using in gem5, there are different stats that represent these 
values.  I'd recommend looking for these different stats in your output.

  Joel

On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Rodrigo Reynolds Ramírez 
<rodrigo.r...@hotmail.com> wrote:




Yes, I runned it for the ROI from a checkpoint, I got three sets of statics, I 
copy the results for ROI.
Rodrigo

Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 21:44:30 +0530

From: biswa....@gmail.com
To: gem5-users@gem5.org
Subject: Re: [gem5-users] Parsec and Alpha


No that's not the case always. Did you run for the ROI?


On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 9:35 PM, Rodrigo Reynolds Ramírez 
<rodrigo.r...@hotmail.com> wrote:





I think the OS scheduler tries to balance the cpu's load avoiding that ipc 
difference.

Rodrigo
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 19:48:55 +0530
From: biswa....@gmail.com


To: gem5-users@gem5.org
Subject: Re: [gem5-users] Parsec and Alpha

why would the ipc be same?



On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Rodrigo Reynolds Ramírez 
<rodrigo.r...@hotmail.com> wrote:




Hello everyone
I am currently working with parsec+alpha, I have executed some tests using the 
small inputs using two cpus, is it normal to get a very unbalanced ipc? These 
are my results:




        
        
        
        




        
        
                Bench / IPC
                CPU0
                CPU1
        
        
                blackscholes
                1.659
                0.338138
        
        
                bodytrack
                0.374274
                0.319496
        
        
                canneal
                0.108077
                0.529619
        
        
                dedup
                0.585347
                0.292882
        
        
                ferret
                0.71402
                0.337503
        
        
                fluidanimate
                1.493102
                0.297794
        
        
                freqmine
                0.596511
                0.305602
        
        
                streamcluster
                0.243343
                0.303156
        
        
                swaptions
                0.24285
                0.331316
        
        
                vips
                0.280734
                0.403565
        
        
                x264
                0.491017
                0.314645
        

For most benchmarks there is a big difference in the ipc between cpus, I would 
think the ipc should be almost the same.
I am using the alpha image provided here http://www.cs.utexas.edu/~parsec_m5/, 
I am using the memory classic model, checkpoints and the launcher scripts 
generated with .rcS Run Script Generator.



Thanks in advance,
Rodrigo                                           

_______________________________________________

gem5-users mailing list

gem5-users@gem5.org

http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users


-- 

thanks&regards



BISWABANDAN
http://www.cse.iitm.ac.in/~biswa/
“We might fall down, but we will never lay down. We might not be the 
best, but we will beat the best! We might not be at the top, but we 
will rise.”





_______________________________________________
gem5-users mailing list
gem5-users@gem5.org
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users                            
          

_______________________________________________

gem5-users mailing list

gem5-users@gem5.org

http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users


-- 

thanks&regards


BISWABANDAN
http://www.cse.iitm.ac.in/~biswa/
“We might fall down, but we will never lay down. We might not be the 
best, but we will beat the best! We might not be at the top, but we 
will rise.”





_______________________________________________
gem5-users mailing list
gem5-users@gem5.org
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users                            
          

_______________________________________________

gem5-users mailing list

gem5-users@gem5.org

http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users


-- 
  Joel Hestness
  PhD Student, Computer Architecture

  Dept. of Computer Science, University of Wisconsin - Madison
  http://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~hestness/


_______________________________________________
gem5-users mailing list
gem5-users@gem5.org
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users                            
          
_______________________________________________
gem5-users mailing list
gem5-users@gem5.org
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users

Reply via email to