Fernando , thanks .
I had checked the config.ini  and all the configurations seem the same as I
set and fine.
I don't know whether I can rely on the results or not.
if anyone else has achieved instruction cache results I would really
aopreciate to know about them.



On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Fernando Endo <[email protected]>wrote:

> Hello,
>
> You should check if in the config.ini the cache size is what you
> configured. There may be minor bugs...
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Fernando A. Endo, PhD student and researcher
>
> Université de Grenoble, UJF
> France
>
>
>
> 2014-03-01 15:13 GMT+01:00 Fateme Movafagh <[email protected]>:
>
>  thanks Mahmood ,actually I decreased the i-cache size to 512Byte ,miss
>> rate changed but didn't differ a lot.
>>
>> the command line in gem5 :
>> ./build/X86/gem5.fast configs/example/fs.py
>> --script=scirpts/blackscholes_1c_simsmall.rcS --caches --l2cache
>> --l1i_size=1kB --l1d_size=1kB --l1i_assoc=2 --cacheline_size=64
>>
>> and I have used Texas disk image.
>>
>> with this configuration miss rate is 16% ( the sum of
>> "system.cpu.icache.overall_miss_rate:: total" in 4 separate sets of
>> statistics in stat.txt file. )
>> also I ran blackscholes on sniper simulator for the same I-cache
>> configuration and the miss rate was about 33% .
>> If anyone has experienced the same issue , I would really appreciate to
>> let me know about the correctness of miss rate results.
>>
>> thanks .
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Mahmood Naderan <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>> You can try other workloads or reduce the i-cache size (8KB) to verify
>>> if it working properly.
>>>
>>> On 2/28/14, Fateme Movafagh <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > hi all,
>>> > I am running parsec on gem5 x86 full system with --caches --cachel2
>>> option
>>> > .
>>> > in the stat.txt file , the result of total Icache miss rate is very
>>> small,
>>> > I'm wondering maybe I have made a mistake.
>>> > for example in blackscholes even for 512B instruction cache , the miss
>>> rate
>>> > is 0.0097 and for 1kB instruction cache , it is 0.0076 .
>>> > how should I interpret these results ?
>>> > any help?
>>> >
>>> > thanks in advance.
>>> > --
>>> > Fateme Movafagh
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> Mahmood
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> gem5-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Fateme Movafagh
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gem5-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gem5-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>



-- 
Fateme Movafagh
_______________________________________________
gem5-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users

Reply via email to