Sanem, maybe you put sleep() somewhere in the code that never executes! Can you confirm that by breakpoints?
On 4/4/14, Sanem Arslan <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I am using classic memory system and I have added several codes to > the "cache_impl.hh" and "blk.hh" files. However I cannot see the > performance overhead of these added codes on the gem5 execution time. > I have increased cache latency parameters from "CacheConfig.py" file > and I can see the values are updated through out the simulation by > looking trace file, but there is no significant impact on execution > time (sim_seconds). There is a post > (http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.m5.users/15517/focus=15526) > that > claims there is no significant impact of increasing latency because of > optimizations implemented in the cache protocol in Classic Memory. > > Moreover I have changed "blk->whenReady" parameter aggresively and I > have put some sleep() functions somewhere in cache structures again, > but there is no effect on the execution time. > > How can I observe the performance overhead of my added codes? If you > have any suggestions, please let me know. > > By the way, I am using gem5.opt and X86 with full system mode. > > Thanks for you time and help. > > Sanem. > _______________________________________________ > gem5-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users > -- Regards, Mahmood _______________________________________________ gem5-users mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
