Hello,

The message "kernel too old" usually appears when the toolchain you're
using embed linux headers newer than the version of your kernel.

Are you using the native gcc in the gem5's disk image (the new one)? I
had no major problems to compile PARSEC 3.0. There were only a few
dependencies to be installed (zlib, pkgconfig, libffi, m4 and
gettext). PARSEC also embed some needed libraries, glib for example.

Hope it helps,

2014-05-07 1:56 GMT+02:00, Jack Harvard via gem5-users <[email protected]>:
> Hi Luming,
>
> When you compile PARSEC statically, you still run the workloads in FS
> mode inside the kernel rather than in SE, suppose FS in your case from
> what you described? and I'm not quite sure why you were referring to
> src/arch/x86/linux/syscalls.cc, is this just for SE?
>
> You can enable debug flags in gem5, and also insert printfs in your
> kernel code, to help with your kernel boot debug.
>
> Jack
> Jack Harvard
>
>
> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 7:31 AM, luming via gem5-users
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Dear gem5 users,
>>
>> I have been stuck on a kernel too old problem when running PARSEC3.0. The
>> disk image file downloaded from gem5.org doesn't not contain the
>> GLIBC_2.14
>> library which is needed by PARSEC, so I built the benchmarks statically.
>> However, now it reports FATAL: kernel too old.
>>
>> After googling, I tried the approach to let m5 report its kernel version
>> a
>> little higher (and lower after that didn't work) than the original value
>> in
>> src/arch/x86/linux/syscalls.cc by modifying
>>
>> strcpy(name->release, "3.0.0"); to strcpy(name->release, "3.2.58"); or
>> strcpy(name->release, "2.6.35");
>>
>> But nothing changes. I still get that problem. Then I tried to build
>> newer
>> kernels (3.10.38 and 3.2.58)
>> with default settings. When using the 3.10.38 kernel, gem5 got stuck at
>> this
>> booting step
>>
>> pps_core: Software ver. 5.3.6 - Copyright 2005-2007 Rodolfo Giometti
>> <[email protected]>
>> PTP clock support registered
>>
>> and 3.2.58 kernel caused this error
>>
>> fatal: Unable to find destination for addr 0x80000000000000ed on bus
>> system.iobus
>>
>> Can anyone tell me how to solve this problem? Is building a newer kernel
>> very difficult or I just missed something? Any help is greatly
>> appreciated.
>> Thanks in advance!
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Luming
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gem5-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
> _______________________________________________
> gem5-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>


-- 
--
Fernando A. Endo, PhD student and researcher

Université de Grenoble, UJF
France
_______________________________________________
gem5-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users

Reply via email to