I've been trying to run a few benchmarks from the Moby benchmark suite. The
results that I'm getting are no close to the ones reported in the paper (
asg.ict.ac.cn/projects/*moby*/downloads/*Moby*-ISPASS2014.pdf). The
parameters that I was using are slightly different but I still think that
the difference is too much.
Configuration I'm using:
L1 icache and dcache: 4 way associative, size 32kB
L2: 16 way associative, size 512kB
Memory: type-lpddr2_1066_x32 size:256MB(The size given in the paper is 1GB)
cpu type: arm_detailed
number of cpus: 1(The paper uses 2 cores)

I havent made any other changes to the source files, like access times.
For example, for the mxplayer benchmark the icache overall miss rate is
more than an order less than that for dcache. In the paper, it is given the
other way around. Is this because of the difference in the parameters that
I've taken or have the authors made other changes?
Thanks a lot.
Cheers.
--Vishaal Mohan
_______________________________________________
gem5-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users

Reply via email to