HI,
Is the targets_per_mshr set for the L2 level ??
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 12:38 PM, yuhang liu via gem5-users <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear Sir/Madam,
>
> With O3 CPU model, I test tgts_per_mshr = 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, and found
> that the performance is best when tgts_per_mshr = 1. Could someone
> explain it ? It seems that tgts_per_mshr = 1 equals to tgts_per_mshr =
> Infinite large.
>
> tgts_per_mshr12481632401.bzip2 running time0.04500.0720.0630.0460.0453
> 0.0452403.gcc running time0.01410.0150.0150.0140.01430.0142
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Best regards.
>
> Yuhang
>
> BaseCache::BaseCache(const Params *p)
> : MemObject(p),
> mshrQueue("MSHRs", p->mshrs, 4, MSHRQueue_MSHRs),
> writeBuffer("write buffer", p->write_buffers, p->mshrs+1000,
> MSHRQueue_WriteBuffer),
> blkSize(p->system->cacheLineSize()),
> hitLatency(p->hit_latency),
> responseLatency(p->response_latency),
> numTarget(p->tgts_per_mshr),
> forwardSnoops(p->forward_snoops),
> isTopLevel(p->is_top_level),
> blocked(0),
> noTargetMSHR(NULL),
> missCount(p->max_miss_count),
> addrRanges(p->addr_ranges.begin(), p->addr_ranges.end()),
> system(p->system)
> {
> }
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gem5-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>
--
*thanks®ards*
*BISWABANDAN*
http://www.cse.iitm.ac.in/~biswa/
“We might fall down, but we will never lay down. We might not be the best,
but we will beat the best! We might not be at the top, but we will rise.”
_______________________________________________
gem5-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
