Prathap,

75 L2 misses, 26 L2 writebacks. 26 writebacks is what I would expect, given
the 1,664 bytesWritten reported by the memory controller. However, what
about the other 2,432 bytes in the array that were written?  I dumped the
stats after the process exited, so I wouldn't expect any of the written
data at that point to be sitting in the caches.

Thanks for the response.
Patrick

On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 9:27 PM, Prathap Kolakkampadath <[email protected]
> wrote:

> Hello Patrick,
>
> Can you check the number of last level cache misses as reported by
> stats.text?
>
> Prathap
> On Apr 21, 2015 5:47 PM, "Patrick" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I looked back at this, and I'm still not sure it's clear to me what is
>> going on. I decreased the size of the write queue to 2, and when running
>> the simulation described in my previous message (in which 512 64-bit stores
>> to unique addresses are issued), bytesWritten in one run was reported to be
>> only 1,664 bytes. With the write queue set to size 2, I would expect
>> bytesWritten to be at least 4096 - 128 = 3,968 bytes (the burstSize is 64
>> bytes).
>>
>> Any additional help is appreciated.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Patrick
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Patrick <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks, Andreas. This makes sense.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Andreas Hansson <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>  Hi Patrick,
>>>>
>>>>  When it comes to the stores you are looking at a rather small number
>>>> of operations, and my guess is that they are still in the DRAM write
>>>> queues. These queues are not drained at the moment once the writes fall
>>>> below the “low water mark”.
>>>>
>>>>  Andreas
>>>>
>>>>   From: Patrick <[email protected]>
>>>> Reply-To: gem5 users mailing list <[email protected]>
>>>> Date: Wednesday, 15 April 2015 19:13
>>>> To: gem5 users mailing list <[email protected]>
>>>> Subject: [gem5-users] bytesWritten < (8 * number of 64-bit stores to
>>>> unique addresses)
>>>>
>>>>  I am looking at stats.txt for the amount of data written to the DRAM
>>>> during the execution of a process in full system mode. I looked at the
>>>> execution trace, and there are at least 512 64-bit stores to unique
>>>> addresses. However, stats.txt reports only 2,304 "bytesWritten" to the
>>>> memory. It is a 4-channel memory configuration. "stats.txt" reports 1,152
>>>> "bytesWritten" on channel 0, 0 "bytesWritten" to channel 1, 0
>>>> "bytesWritten" to channel 2, and 1,152 "bytesWritten" to channel 3.
>>>>
>>>>  Does anyone know what would cause this? I thought maybe the data
>>>> might be getting left in the caches, but I am waiting until the process
>>>> exits before calling m5 resetstats. The "bytesReadDRAM" is less than
>>>> expected, also, based on the number of loads in the instruction trace.
>>>> I thought perhaps this was because no-write allocate was being used, but
>>>> the discussion linked below suggests that default is to use write-allocate.
>>>> I can't find where this is configured in gem5, so I'm not able to check
>>>> this at the moment.
>>>>
>>>>  http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.m5.users/12597
>>>>
>>>>  Any help is appreciated.
>>>>
>>>>   ​-​
>>>> Patrick
>>>>
>>>> -- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are
>>>> confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
>>>> recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the
>>>> contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the
>>>> information in any medium. Thank you.
>>>>
>>>> ARM Limited, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ,
>>>> Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2557590
>>>> ARM Holdings plc, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1
>>>> 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2548782
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> gem5-users mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gem5-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gem5-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>
_______________________________________________
gem5-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users

Reply via email to