Thanks Tao.
One more question : If I have LPDDR4 Memory Controller developed in
SystemC, will it work with gem5?

Dhaval

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 9:30 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:

> Send gem5-users mailing list submissions to
>         [email protected]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         [email protected]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         [email protected]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of gem5-users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: Physical memory size is greater than 3GB. Twice       the
>       number of memory controllers would be created. (Ashif Sikder)
>    2. LPDDR4 SDRAM support in gem5? (Dhaval Shah)
>    3. Re: LPDDR4 SDRAM support in gem5? (Tao Zhang)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 16:06:10 +0000 (UTC)
> From: Ashif Sikder <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [gem5-users] Physical memory size is greater than 3GB.
>         Twice   the number of memory controllers would be created.
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> Andreas Hansson <Andreas.Hansson <at> arm.com> writes:
>
> >
> > Hi Ashif,
> >
> > I am not too familiar with the x86 system configs in gem5, but if I
> > remember correctly there is a 3 GB “hole” in the memory map where the
> > first 3 GB goes, and then the remainder goes in some upper address (above
> > 32 bit). The consequence is that you get two distinct memory ranges, and
> > each range gets as many channels as you have specified. Thus, in your
> case
> > you have 8 channels(!).
> >
> > The other part is the use of large simulated memories. By default gem5
> > calls mmap in such a way that the host machine has to guarantee swap
> > space. You can try and run without this by changing the System parameter
> > mmap_noreserve. I have successfully seen simulation runs with many Tbyte
> > of memory per socket using this technique. As long as you don’t touch all
> > the memory in the guest this should work.
> >
> > Andreas
> >
> > On 18/09/2015 01:14, "gem5-users on behalf of Ashif Sikder"
> > <gem5-users-bounces <at> gem5.org on behalf of ms047914 <at> ohio.edu>
> wrote:
> >
> > >Hi all,
> > >
> > >I'm new to Gem5. When I try to run Gem5 in Full System mode for x86
> > >architecture with --mem-size=16GB, on the master terminal I get:
> > >
> > >"warn: Physical memory size specified is 16GB which is greater than 3GB.
> > >Twice the number of memory controllers would be created."
> > >
> > >and simulation gets aborted after showing (on the master terminal):
> > >
> > >"fatal: Could not mmap 13958643712 bytes for range [0x100000000 :
> > >0x43fffffff]!".
> > >
> > >In case of --mem-size=8GB, I get the same warning (on the master
> > >terminal):
> > >"warn: Physical memory size specified is 8GB which is greater than 3GB.
> > >Twice the number of memory controllers would be created."
> > >
> > >but it runs and after showing:
> > >
> > >"Initializing CPU#0
> > >Checking aperture...
> > >No AGP bridge found
> > >PCI-DMA: Using software bounce buffering for IO (SWIOTLB)
> > >Placing 64MB software IO TLB between ffff880020000000 - ffff880024000000
> > >software IO TLB at phys 0x20000000 - 0x24000000
> > >Memory: 8183752k/9437184k available (4469k kernel code, 1048964k absent,
> > >203544k reserved, 2815k data, 376k init)"
> > >
> > >on the slave terminal simulation gets aborted.
> > >
> > >I have looked into the discussion at
> > >http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.m5.users/17539  and the
> > >source code at /configs/common/FSConfig.py but could not solve the
> > >problem.
> > >
> > >The command line used is:
> > >
> > >./build/X86/gem5-MESI2L.opt ./configs/example/fs.py
> > >--disk-image=linux-x86.img --kernel=x86-vmlinux-2.6.22.9.smp
> > >--cpu-type=timing --ruby --num-cpus=16 --mesh-rows=4 --num-dirs=4
> > >--mem-type=DDR4_2400_x64 --mem-channels=4 --mem-size=8GB
> > >--topology=MeshDirCorners
> > >
> > >Any help will be highly appreciated. Thanks.
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >gem5-users mailing list
> > >gem5-users <at> gem5.org
> > >http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
>
>
>
> Hi Andreas,
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> I am having hard time to find the system parameter "mmap_noreserve". Can
> you
> give some more information?
>
> If I understand things correctly, the on-chip routers are connected using
> IntLink, cache & directory controllers are connected to routers using
> ExtLink. The directory controllers are connected with the memory
> controllers
> and each memory controller is connected with a memory channel. Right?
>
> If there are two distinct memory ranges each with same number of memory
> channels, how are they connected with the memory controllers? (Memory
> controllers are being doubled too!?).
>
> https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg12225.html
>
> According to the above thread, multiple memory controllers can be connected
> with a directory controller. This might be a naive question,
>
> can multiple directory controllers be connected with a memory controller
> and
> can multiple routers be connected with a directory controller?
>
> And in the command line I used
>
> "-num-dirs=4 --mem-channels=4"
>
> but when I looked into the  config.json  file, there were one  "mem_ctrls"
> with  "channels": 1.  So, my last question will be,
>
> when we define the number of directories and number of channels, how do
> they
> get assigned?
>
> I appreciate your help. Thanks.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 10:13:31 +0530
> From: "Dhaval Shah" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Subject: [gem5-users] LPDDR4 SDRAM support in gem5?
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I am new to gem5 and wanted to know does gem5 supports LPDDR4 DRAM memory
> component. We have LPDDR4 memory controller developed in Verilog.
>
> Can I exercise traffic via gem5 if supported?
>
>
>
> Dhaval
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/gem5-users/attachments/20150924/068bfc9c/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 22:49:57 -0700
> From: Tao Zhang <[email protected]>
> To: gem5 users mailing list <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [gem5-users] LPDDR4 SDRAM support in gem5?
> Message-ID:
>         <CABJ3yzK1GX_hp+gQ9bQ4vH9s3kWx2=
> [email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi Dhaval,
>
> I am not sure what your "LPDDR4 DRAM memory component" meant. If you refers
> to an LPDDR4 controller model, the answer is *yes*. Gem5's memory
> controller supports the basic features of LPDDR4. It already provides you
> the default LPDDR3's timing. You can start from it with necessary
> modifications. Note that the per-bank refresh is not supported yet. If
> that's a "must-be" feature in your design, you may need to add some codes.
> (also, it doesn't model the multi-cycle commands, but in most cases it
> should have little impact on your performance evaluation.)
>
> If you are asking whether there is an LPDDR4 DRAM device model that can
> accepts the commands issued by your verilog controller, the answer is *no*.
> Gem5 is a SW timing model but can't recognize any real signals from RTL
> design.
>
> -Tao
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 9:43 PM, Dhaval Shah <
> [email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> >
> > I am new to gem5 and wanted to know does gem5 supports LPDDR4 DRAM memory
> > component. We have LPDDR4 memory controller developed in Verilog.
> >
> > Can I exercise traffic via gem5 if supported?
> >
> >
> >
> > Dhaval
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gem5-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/gem5-users/attachments/20150923/b9c13310/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> gem5-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of gem5-users Digest, Vol 110, Issue 20
> *******************************************
>
_______________________________________________
gem5-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users

Reply via email to