Hi, There is nothing wrong with it…but the question is why you would do BBV generation with the o3 CPU? The atomic mode CPU is much faster. Why would you not just use that?
Andreas From: gem5-users <gem5-users-boun...@gem5.org<mailto:gem5-users-boun...@gem5.org>> on behalf of Ayaz Akram <aaq...@gmail.com<mailto:aaq...@gmail.com>> Reply-To: gem5 users mailing list <gem5-users@gem5.org<mailto:gem5-users@gem5.org>> Date: Saturday, 12 March 2016 at 19:51 To: gem5 users mailing list <gem5-users@gem5.org<mailto:gem5-users@gem5.org>> Subject: [gem5-users] Detailed Mode BBV Generation Gem5 supports creation of basic block vector profile in atomic mode with fastmem. I have ported the same code to detailed mode so that I can generate basic block vector profile in detailed mode (as in full system mode, I was seeing some differences in execution path in detailed and atomic mode). This functionality seems to be working but I am not sure about the accuracy. I wonder, if there is something potentially wrong with this approach (I mean using the same bbv gen. code with detailed mode) ? IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
_______________________________________________ gem5-users mailing list gem5-users@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
