excuse me. I made a mistake.

On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 2:28 PM, raziye deylamsalehi <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi
>
> can anybody help me?
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 3:04 AM, blindbouf rr <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> hello
>> I installed gem5 and ran dijkstra benchmark (of Mibench) but I saw below
>> error:
>>
>> root@ubuntu:/home/blindbouf/gem5# ./build/ARM/gem5.opt
>> --stats="/home/blindbouf/gem5/tests/test-progs/Mibench/dijkstra/dijkstra_small_stats.txt"
>> configs/example/se.py  -c /home/blindbouf/gem5/tests/tes
>> t-progs/Mibench/dijkstra/dijkstra_small --options="/home/blindbouf/gem
>> 5/tests/test-progs/Mibench/dijkstra/input.dat" >
>> /home/blindbouf/gem5/tests/test-progs/Mibench/dijkstra/dijks
>> tra_small_output.txt
>>
>> warn: DRAM device capacity (8192 Mbytes) does not match the address range
>> assigned (512 Mbytes)
>>
>> fatal: Object file architecture does not match compiled ISA (ARM).
>>
>>  @ tick 0
>>
>> [create:build/ARM/sim/process.cc, line 669]
>>
>> Memory Usage: 656548 KBytes
>>
>> Program aborted at tick 0
>>
>> --- BEGIN LIBC BACKTRACE ---
>>
>> ./build/ARM/gem5.opt(_Z15print_backtracev+0x28)[0x919a68]
>>
>> ./build/ARM/gem5.opt(_Z12abortHandleri+0x46)[0x9301e6]
>>
>> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0(+0x10d10)[0x7facae9a1d10]
>>
>> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(gsignal+0x37)[0x7facad40a267]
>>
>> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(abort+0x16a)[0x7facad40beca]
>>
>> ./build/ARM/gem5.opt(_Z15__exit_epilogueiPKcS0_iS0_+0x1f3)[0x9a4e53]
>>
>> ./build/ARM/gem5.opt(_Z8ccprintfIJ5FlagsItEEEvRSoPKcDpRKT_+0x0)[0x929fc0]
>>
>> ./build/ARM/gem5.opt(_ZN11LiveProcess6createEP17LiveProcessP
>> arams+0x14d)[0x97c04d]
>>
>> ./build/ARM/gem5.opt[0x133297a]
>>
>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0(PyEval_EvalFra
>> meEx+0x54cc)[0x7facaed43f0c]
>>
>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0(PyEval_EvalCod
>> eEx+0x820)[0x7facaed8ef80]
>>
>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0(PyEval_EvalFra
>> meEx+0x57d1)[0x7facaed44211]
>>
>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0(PyEval_EvalCod
>> eEx+0x820)[0x7facaed8ef80]
>>
>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0(PyEval_EvalFra
>> meEx+0x57d1)[0x7facaed44211]
>>
>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0(PyEval_EvalCod
>> eEx+0x820)[0x7facaed8ef80]
>>
>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0(PyEval_EvalFra
>> meEx+0x57d1)[0x7facaed44211]
>>
>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0(PyEval_EvalCod
>> eEx+0x820)[0x7facaed8ef80]
>>
>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0(PyEval_EvalFra
>> meEx+0x57d1)[0x7facaed44211]
>>
>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0(PyEval_EvalCod
>> eEx+0x820)[0x7facaed8ef80]
>>
>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0(PyEval_EvalFra
>> meEx+0x57d1)[0x7facaed44211]
>>
>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0(PyEval_EvalCod
>> eEx+0x820)[0x7facaed8ef80]
>>
>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0(PyEval_EvalFra
>> meEx+0x57d1)[0x7facaed44211]
>>
>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0(PyEval_EvalCod
>> eEx+0x820)[0x7facaed8ef80]
>>
>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0(PyEval_EvalFra
>> meEx+0x57d1)[0x7facaed44211]
>>
>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0(PyEval_EvalFra
>> meEx+0x58dd)[0x7facaed4431d]
>>
>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0(PyEval_EvalCod
>> eEx+0x820)[0x7facaed8ef80]
>>
>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0(PyEval_EvalCod
>> e+0x19)[0x7facaed3e6d9]
>>
>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0(PyEval_EvalFra
>> meEx+0x5abb)[0x7facaed444fb]
>>
>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0(PyEval_EvalCod
>> eEx+0x820)[0x7facaed8ef80]
>>
>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0(PyEval_EvalFra
>> meEx+0x57d1)[0x7facaed44211]
>>
>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0(PyEval_EvalCod
>> eEx+0x820)[0x7facaed8ef80]
>>
>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0(PyEval_EvalCod
>> e+0x19)[0x7facaed3e6d9]
>>
>> --- END LIBC BACKTRACE ---
>>
>> Aborted (core dumped)
>>
>>
>> how can I fix this problem? please help me.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gem5-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
gem5-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users

Reply via email to