Jason,

I tried running "sample.py" but got an error:


command line: build/X86/gem5.opt configs/example/sample.py 100 1


Traceback (most recent call last):

  File "<string>", line 1, in <module>

  File "/home/asa78/simulators/nvmain-gem5/gem5/src/python/m5/main.py", line 
388, in main

    exec filecode in scope

  File "configs/example/sample.py", line 51, in <module>

    from system import MySystem

  File "configs/example/system/__init__.py", line 30, in <module>

    from system import MySystem

  File "configs/example/system/system.py", line 34, in <module>

    from caches import *

  File "configs/example/system/caches.py", line 47, in <module>

    class PrefetchCache(Cache):

TypeError: Error when calling the metaclass bases

    module.__init__() takes at most 2 arguments (3 given)


I also get a similar error when running "runkvm.py":

command line: build/X86/gem5.opt configs/example/runkvm.py

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 1, in <module>
  File "/home/asa78/simulators/nvmain-gem5/gem5/src/python/m5/main.py", line 
388, in main
    exec filecode in scope
  File "configs/example/runkvm.py", line 51, in <module>
    from system import MySystem
  File "configs/example/system/__init__.py", line 30, in <module>
    from system import MySystem
  File "configs/example/system/system.py", line 34, in <module>
    from caches import *
  File "configs/example/system/caches.py", line 47, in <module>
    class PrefetchCache(Cache):
TypeError: Error when calling the metaclass bases
    module.__init__() takes at most 2 arguments (3 given)


I also appreciate if you can help me answer the following questions:

  1.  Is "sample.py" compatible with non-kvm gem5 images? If not, then would 
you please let me know how I can change it to be so. I have to admit that I 
have no experience with kvm at all.
  2.  Can "sample.py" process the same set of arguments as the standard fs.py? 
I need to simulate 4 CPUs, 2-levels of cache, ... etc. Can I pass these 
arguments to "sample.py" the same way I do with fs.py?

Thank you,

Ali.

________________________________
From: gem5-users <[email protected]> on behalf of Jason Lowe-Power 
<[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, February 4, 2017 4:20 PM
To: gem5 users mailing list
Subject: Re: [gem5-users] Number of instructions Vs number of ticks + 
resetstats + checkpointing

Hi Ali,

Since you're doing something that isn't fully supported by the fs.py script, I 
would suggest making your own config file. The fs.py script, and the other 
supporting scripts in common/, are not very flexible, and when you want to do 
something that is a little outside of the norm it becomes very hard to make 
changes to those scripts.

To answer your question about the number of instructions, the CPU objects have 
a function exposed to python which returns the number of instructions the CPU 
has executed. Therefore, you can use this to figure out the number of 
instructions from Python. Also, each CPU can cause the simulation to exit after 
it has executed some number of instructions. In fact, I have some scripts that 
do exactly this on my github page 
(https://github.com/powerjg/gem5/tree/devel/simplefs/configs/myconfigs<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fpowerjg%2Fgem5%2Ftree%2Fdevel%2Fsimplefs%2Fconfigs%2Fmyconfigs&data=01%7C01%7Casa78%40pitt.edu%7Cc4cd0dc13636431acc9808d44d43b84f%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112fd0d%7C1&sdata=g5gvXG3nLiVPYnJy5pLMSXMiM%2FXE%2F1iBzWPGdAMFITM%3D&reserved=0>).
 My scripts fast-forward with KVM instead of restoring from a checkpoint, but 
the skeletons for the code are similar either way.

Let me know if you have more questions.

Jason

On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 5:41 AM Alsuwaiyan, Ali Saleh 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Hi everyone,


I'm relatively new to gem5 and came across a problem where I need to perform 
the following:

1. reset the stats and checkpoint, both after 10M instructions

2. restore the checkpoint with detailed CPU type and run for 1B instructions 
then stop


The problem is that both resetstats and checkpoint commands take the number of 
ticks as input, while what I need is the number of instructions.


I know that this question has been asked previously (e.g., 
https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00489.html<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mail-archive.com%2Fgem5-users%40gem5.org%2Fmsg00489.html&data=01%7C01%7Casa78%40pitt.edu%7Cc4cd0dc13636431acc9808d44d43b84f%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112fd0d%7C1&sdata=M76CjAO2TYRkS8Uvdj%2F9yzQzE9%2FHNj%2BELNsR0XxjcPE%3D&reserved=0>,
 a 2011 thread), however, no accurate answer has been provided.


Currently, I'm using ticks instead of instructions in step 1 above; however, 
the number of instructions is different from one workload to another, when 
keeping the number of ticks constant. Here is my command line for step 1:


build/X86/gem5.opt configs/example/fs.py --caches 
--disk-image=linux-x86-large.img --kernel=x86_64-vmlinux-3.2.24.smp 
--l1d_size=128kB --l1i_size=128kB --l2cache --l2_size=8MB --l2_assoc=8 
--cacheline_size=64 -n 4 --script=configs/boot/myworkloads/wd1.rcS -r 1 
--rel-max-tick=250000000000


Here, checkpoint 1 is taken by the standard boot script "hack_back_ckpt.rcS", 
which hands over control to wd1.rcS script after restoring. Also, the 
rel-max-tick is set to stop the execution after the checkpoint is created. The 
content of wd1.rcS is as follows:


#!/bin/sh


echo "delayed checkpoint..."

/sbin/m5 checkpoint   200000000

echo "delayed resetstat..."

/sbin/m5 resetstats   200000000


cd /myapps/spec/benchspec/CPU2006/437.leslie3d/data/ref/input


echo "Starting leslie3d..."

taskset 0x1 
/myapps/spec/benchspec/CPU2006/437.leslie3d/exe/leslie3d_base.gcc43-64bit < 
leslie3d.in<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fleslie3d.in&data=01%7C01%7Casa78%40pitt.edu%7Cc4cd0dc13636431acc9808d44d43b84f%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112fd0d%7C1&sdata=xPWh14k%2BOK7TfIdzXnc6Qyt%2BnC0YOkvdKdQxg5UqGBs%3D&reserved=0>
 > leslie3d.ref.out 2> leslie3d.ref.err &


echo "Starting leslie3d..."

taskset 0x2 
/myapps/spec/benchspec/CPU2006/437.leslie3d/exe/leslie3d_base.gcc43-64bit < 
leslie3d.in<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fleslie3d.in&data=01%7C01%7Casa78%40pitt.edu%7Cc4cd0dc13636431acc9808d44d43b84f%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112fd0d%7C1&sdata=xPWh14k%2BOK7TfIdzXnc6Qyt%2BnC0YOkvdKdQxg5UqGBs%3D&reserved=0>
 > leslie3d.ref.out2 2> leslie3d.ref.err2 &



cd /myapps/spec/benchspec/CPU2006/429.mcf/data/ref/input

echo "Starting mcf..."

taskset 0x4 /myapps/spec/benchspec/CPU2006/429.mcf/exe/mcf_base.gcc43-64bit 
inp.in<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Finp.in&data=01%7C01%7Casa78%40pitt.edu%7Cc4cd0dc13636431acc9808d44d43b84f%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112fd0d%7C1&sdata=NSrfIWOztC0EsoUanW6K6xdkqqIsDCc4nR8TiM7XAZA%3D&reserved=0>
 > mcf.ref.out 2> mcf.ref.err &


echo "Starting mcf..."

taskset 0x8 /myapps/spec/benchspec/CPU2006/429.mcf/exe/mcf_base.gcc43-64bit 
inp.in<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Finp.in&data=01%7C01%7Casa78%40pitt.edu%7Cc4cd0dc13636431acc9808d44d43b84f%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112fd0d%7C1&sdata=NSrfIWOztC0EsoUanW6K6xdkqqIsDCc4nR8TiM7XAZA%3D&reserved=0>
 > mcf.ref.out2 2> mcf.ref.err2 &


echo "Waiting ..."

wait

echo "finished!"


/sbin/m5 exit



When the script exists and the second checkpoint is created, I simply carry on 
to step #2 using the command below:


build/X86/gem5.opt configs/example/fs.py --caches 
--disk-image=linux-x86-large.img --kernel=x86_64-vmlinux-3.2.24.smp 
--l1d_size=128kB --l1i_size=128kB --l2cache --l2_size=8MB --l2_assoc=8 
--cacheline_size=64 -n 4 -r 2 --cpu-type=detailed -I 1000000000


I know that the "-I" option counts the instructions from the beginning, but at 
least it uses instructions as a unit, not ticks.


I'm very sure someone has done something regarding this, i.e., resetstats and 
checkpoint at "instruction#"  instead of at "tick#". I have seen this done by 
many papers in the literature.


Your feedback is highly appreciated.


BTW, my gem5 revision number is 10791.


Thank you,

Ali.

_______________________________________________
gem5-users mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fm5sim.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fgem5-users&data=01%7C01%7Casa78%40pitt.edu%7Cc4cd0dc13636431acc9808d44d43b84f%7C9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112fd0d%7C1&sdata=l4rz1nqbBhD8hOMn8iKjxqv%2Bp3PA4uJT0G%2F9zilR5qs%3D&reserved=0>
_______________________________________________
gem5-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users

Reply via email to