Hi Cano,

I can’t test this as I don’t have your binaries to reproduce the problem, but 
do adding these lines in MOESI_CMP_directory-dma.sm fix your problem?

action(zz_stallAndWaitRequestQueue, "zz", desc="...") {
    stall_and_wait(dmaRequestQueue_in, address);
}

transition({BUSY_RD,BUSY_WR}, {ReadRequest,WriteRequest}) {
    zz_stallAndWaitRequestQueue;
}

Thanks,
Michael

From: gem5-users [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Javier Cano 
Cano
Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2017 10:23 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [gem5-users] Outstanding DMA requests and MOESI_CMP_directory protocol

Hi everybody,
Some days ago, I updated my gem5 version in order to test Garnet2.0. But I 
found that MOESI_CMP_directory protocol wasn't working. As far as I know, the 
problem comes from the patch 
http://repo.gem5.org/gem5?cmd=changeset;node=0bf388858d1e This patch allows 
outstanding DMA requests. Some protocols had been updated to support this new 
feature but MOESI_CMP_directory, as well as others, doesn't.
I'm using the following command to build Gem5:
scons ./build/X86/gem5.opt PROTOCOL=MOESI_CMP_directory  RUBY=True -j30

To run the simulation, the following instructions had been used:

./build/X86/gem5.opt configs/example/fs.py --ruby 
--kernel=/home/cano/gem5/system/binaries/x86_64-vmlinux-3.4.112.smp 
--disk-image=/home/cano/curgem5/canolab/system/disks/gentoo.img


The error that gem5 shows when I try to run a simulation is:

panic: Invalid transition
system.ruby.dma_cntrl0 time: 9702290051<tel:%28970%29%20229-0051> addr: 
504500288 event: WriteRequest state: BUSY_WR
 @ tick 4851145025500
[doTransitionWorker:build/X86/mem/protocol/DMA_Transitions.cc, line 135]


The problem has something to do with file MOESI_CMP_directory-dma.sm which 
doesn't support the state changes introduced on patch 0bf388858d1e.

Did someone have this problem?
I tried to update the protocol, but no luck, I get a error saying that the 
queues have more than 100 messages stored on it.

Does anyone have the MOESI_CMP_directory files modified to support this new 
feature?

In order to temporally fix the problem, I rolled back the changes introduced on 
the mentioned patch.
Thanks for your time.
Cano.
_______________________________________________
gem5-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users

Reply via email to