Now, I tried the splash-2 benchmarks and even the parsec 2.1(Alpha +
Mesi_two_level) in both cases, I can get results within very short time if
I ignore the Garent network.

When I run the  fft (splash2) with garnet options, I found that program get
hanged after line- "SMP starting up secondaries" and nothing after that.

In case of parsec 2.1 (other than blackscholes), all the giving the "INFO:
task vips:894 blocked for more than 120 seconds" and running for long long
time and can't getting out of loop.

Please help me.

Thanks in advance.

F. A. Faisal

On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 1:51 PM, F. A. Faisal <dipu.7...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I could obtain the blackscholes performance within 3hrs using
> MESI_Two_Level. However, MOESI_CMP_directory is very slow and requires more
> than 3hrs before starting the  ROI section.
>
> I recompiled the program as you mentioned and I found the system is
> showing some INFO message through the telnet localhost (However, I
> couldn't find such INFO message in case of blackscholes) and still running
> for about 24 hrs-
>
> Linux version: Scientific Linux release 6.1 (Carbon)
>
>
> # scons FULL_SYSTEM=1 build/ALPHA/gem5.fast RUBY=true
> PROTOCOL=MESI_Two_Level
>
> # ./build/ALPHA/gem5.fast configs/example/fs.py --cpu-type=timing
> --script=script/vips_16c_simsmall.rcS --mem-size=1GB --num-cpus=16 --ruby
> --mesh-rows=4 --network=garnet2.0 --topology=Mesh_XY  --caches --l2cache
> --l2_size=16MB --num-dirs=16 --num-l2=16 --l1d_size=64kB --l1i_size=64kB
> --l1d_assoc=2 --l1i_assoc=2 --disk-image=/home1/xxx/gem5/
> system/alpha/m5_system_2.0b3/disks/linux-parsec-2-1-m5.img
>
> INFO: task vips:894 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
>
> "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
>
> vips          D 0000000000000000     0   894    871
>
> fffffc003f073da8 0000000000000001 fffffc000036e078 fffffc003f3ce740
>
>        00000000003b9ac9 0000000000000003 fffffc000035a16c 0000000000000000
>
>        fffffc000036ddc0 fffffc000086bf40 fffffc000081bf40 fffffc000035a0f0
>
>        fffffc0000819040 fffffc003f063ea8 fffffc0000000063 fffffc0000811b80
>
>        fffffc00008113b8 fffffc00003111d0 fffffc00003111e8 fffffc003f05fd40
>
>        fffffc003f05fce8 fffffc0000821760 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
>
> Trace:
>
> [<fffffc000036e078>] watchdog+0x2b8/0x320
>
> [<fffffc000035a16c>] kthread+0x7c/0xd0
>
> [<fffffc000036ddc0>] watchdog+0x0/0x320
>
> [<fffffc000035a0f0>] kthread+0x0/0xd0
>
> [<fffffc00003111d0>] kernel_thread+0x10/0x90
> [<fffffc00003111e8>] kernel_thread+0x28/0x90
>
>  Thanks in advance.
>
> F. A. Faisal
>
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:35 PM, Krishna, Tushar <tus...@ece.gatech.edu>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Faisal,
>> I see you are running a 256 threaded vips on the 16 core system. Maybe
>> try a 16 threaded version?
>> Also, can you try running without garnet -- I'm curious to see how long
>> the benchmarks take in that case.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Tushar
>>
>>
>> On Jun 21, 2017, at 3:07 AM, F. A. Faisal <dipu.7...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> I tried to simulate the Parsec 2.1 benchmarks with garnet 2.0.
>> I found that other than Blackscholes, rest of benchmarks are taking
>> several days (and still executing) and even I tried with increasing the
>> <nthread> num of benchmarks, which actually don't have too much effect.
>> However, the actual executions time should be in few hours.
>> Please help me to increase the execution rate and how to know, how many
>> percentage of benchmark program is being finished.
>>
>> My simlutation conditions-
>>
>> # scons FULL_SYSTEM=1 build/ALPHA/gem5.fast RUBY=true
>> PROTOCOL=MESI_Two_Level
>>
>> # ./build/ALPHA/gem5.fast configs/example/fs.py --cpu-type=timing
>> --script=script/vips_256c_simsmall.rcS  --num-cpus=16 --mem-size=1GB
>> --ruby --mesh-rows=4 --network=garnet2.0 --topology=Mesh_XY  --caches
>> --l2cache --l2_size=1MB --num-dirs=16 --num-l2=16 --l1d_size=32kB
>> --l1i_size=32kB --l1d_assoc=2 --l1i_assoc=2 --disk-image=/home1/faisal/gem
>> 5/system/alpha/m5_system_2.0b3/disks/linux-parsec-2-1-m5.img
>>
>> Thanks in advance...
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> F. A. Faisal
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gem5-users mailing list
>> gem5-users@gem5.org
>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gem5-users mailing list
>> gem5-users@gem5.org
>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
gem5-users mailing list
gem5-users@gem5.org
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users

Reply via email to