Hi Jason,
Last email was incomplete sorry for that.
I am running following system,
./build/ARM/gem5.debug --debug-flags ProtocolTrace configs/example/fs.py
--l1d_size=32kB --l1i_size=32kB --num-l2caches 4 --l2_size=1MB
--cacheline_size=64 --machine-type=VExpress_GEM5_V1 --kernel
/home/khilji/gem5/m5/system/binaries/vmlinux-aarch32 --disk-image
/home/khilji/gem5/m5/system/disks/arm-ubuntu-natty-headless.img
--dtb-filename /home/khilji/gem5/m5/system/dtb/armv7_gem5_v1_4cpu.dtb
--num-cpus 4 --cpu-type ex5_big --ruby --num-dirs=4 --network=garnet2.0
--topology Mesh_XY --mesh-rows 2 --mem-size 1G
I am facing following problem,
panic: Possible Deadlock detected. Aborting! version: 3 request.paddr:
0x801578d8 m_readRequestTable: 1 current time: 3244524422000 issue_time:
3244269289000 difference: 255133000
Memory Usage: 1581920 Kbytes
This was in the gem5.fast simulation and when I repeated it in the debug
with ProtocolTrace on I got following results
547724013000 0 L1Cache Ifetch S>S
[0x80243000, line 0x80243000]
547724013500 0 Directory DMA_READ M_DRDI>M_DRDI
[0xbf040000, line 0xbf040000]
547724014000 0 Seq Begin >
[0x80243010, line 0x80243000]
IFETCH
547724014500 0 Seq Done >
[0x80243010,
line 0x80243000] 1 cycles
547724014500 0 L1Cache Ifetch S>S
[0x80243000, line 0x80243000]
547724015500 0 Seq Begin >
[0x80243020, line
0x80243000] IFETCH
547724016000 0 Seq Done >
[0x80243020, line
0x80243000] 1 cycles
547724016000 0 L1Cache Ifetch S>S
[0x80243000, line 0x80243000]
547724018000 1 DMA Data BUSY_RD>READY
[0xbf040000, line 0xbf040000]
547724018500 0 Directory DMA_READ M_DRDI>M_DRDI
[0xbf040000, line 0xbf040000]
gem5.debug: build/ARM/mem/ruby/network/MessageBuffer.cc:220: Tick
MessageBuffer::dequeue(Tick, bool): Assertion `isReady(current_time)'
failed.
Program aborted at tick 547724021000
The directory controller does many DMA reads but after the read at tick
547724018500 the assertion in message buffer of network fails.
I am using MESI_Two_Level protocol and this protocol did not support
multiple DMA controllers. I have added the support for the multiple DMA
controllers in this protocol. If that is the issue. I am facing this issue
with ex5_big and DerivO3CPU. Simulation with TimingSimpleCPU is fine.
Kindly, if you can suggest any thing in this issue. Thanks!
best regards,
Muhammad
_______________________________________________
gem5-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users