Hi Da,

You likely need to enable gem5's multithreaded mode to get many CPUs to
boot correctly. I've had success with up to 32 cores on a 4-core 8-thread
system. I'm not sure if fs.py automatically does this correctly or not. See
my scripts here:
https://github.com/jlpresearch/gem5/tree/jason/kvm-testing/configs/myconfigs
(note:
I haven't rebased in a couple of months).

Cheers,
Jason

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 7:52 AM Da Zhang <d...@vt.edu> wrote:

> Hey Jason,
>
> The package works.
> However, I encountered performance issues with increased CPU number. The
> performance was very great with up to 4 CPUs ("-n", I am assuming "number
> of CPUs" equal to "number of cores" for testing multithreading workload
> later). However, the system fails to boot (or maybe it was just too slow)
> when I scale it >= 5 CPUs. Any ideas or suggestions?
>
> I am working on a node with 2 x Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2470 v2 @ 2.40GHz,
> 10 physic cores each (and 40 logical cores in total). I only used the fs.py
> script with --cpu-type=X86KvmCPU, --mem-size=8GB and -n 4. Moreover, the
> ancient Linux kernel and image from gem5 website have no performance
> problem with increased CPUs.
>
> best,
> Da Zhang
>
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 3:50 PM, Da Zhang <d...@vt.edu> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jason
>>
>> The package works (I used the second one)! And it also works with the
>> package you provided (
>> https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/7301) in my another
>> email to fix the keyboard and mouse issue for running later linux kernel
>> and ubuntu. (However, there are some conflicts in this package, and it is a
>> little tricky to merge them.)
>>
>> Now, I can run gem5 for linux kernel v4.8.13 and ubuntu 16.04.1 with
>> kvm support. And the speedup is so amazing. It used to take me 20 ~ 30
>> minutes to boot up the system without the kvm cpu. Now, it takes only
>> several seconds!!!
>>
>> Thanks so much!
>>
>> best,
>> Da
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 12:01 PM, Jason Lowe-Power <ja...@lowepower.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> These patches "fix" the problem. However, they may not apply cleanly to
>>> HEAD and they definitely are not cleanly implemented.
>>>
>>> https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/7362
>>> https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/7361
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Jason
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 8:49 PM Da Zhang <d...@vt.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I am trying to run fs.py with kvm support which might help speedup
>>>> our simulation in full system mode. I find the cpu type X86KvmCPU which is
>>>> a "kvm-based hardware virtualized cpu". But running fs.py failed with the
>>>> error information:
>>>>
>>>> panic: KVM: Failed to enter virtualized mode (hw reason: 0x80000021)
>>>>
>>>> Memory Usage: 2416600 KBytes
>>>>
>>>> Program aborted at tick 53418967500
>>>>
>>>> --- BEGIN LIBC BACKTRACE ---
>>>>
>>>> build/X86/gem5.fast(_Z15print_backtracev+0x1f)[0xaee60f]
>>>>
>>>> build/X86/gem5.fast(_Z12abortHandleri+0x34)[0xaee6f4]
>>>>
>>>> /lib64/libpthread.so.0(+0xf5e0)[0x7f5b9ac685e0]
>>>>
>>>> /lib64/libc.so.6(gsignal+0x37)[0x7f5b9901c1f7]
>>>>
>>>> /lib64/libc.so.6(abort+0x148)[0x7f5b9901d8e8]
>>>>
>>>> build/X86/gem5.fast[0x6627df]
>>>>
>>>> build/X86/gem5.fast[0x95d518]
>>>>
>>>> build/X86/gem5.fast(_ZN10BaseKvmCPU13handleKvmExitEv+0x249)[0xc10859]
>>>>
>>>> build/X86/gem5.fast[0xbade3c]
>>>>
>>>> build/X86/gem5.fast(_ZN10EventQueue10serviceOneEv+0x91)[0xad4fc1]
>>>>
>>>> build/X86/gem5.fast(_Z9doSimLoopP10EventQueue+0xa0)[0xb5b110]
>>>>
>>>> build/X86/gem5.fast(_Z8simulatem+0x1f3)[0xb5b563]
>>>>
>>>> build/X86/gem5.fast[0x93867d]
>>>>
>>>> build/X86/gem5.fast[0x939c65]
>>>>
>>>> /lib64/libpython2.7.so.1.0(PyEval_EvalFrameEx+0x730a)[0x7f5b9a56b0ca]
>>>>
>>>> /lib64/libpython2.7.so.1.0(PyEval_EvalCodeEx+0x7ed)[0x7f5b9a56cefd]
>>>>
>>>> /lib64/libpython2.7.so.1.0(PyEval_EvalFrameEx+0x663c)[0x7f5b9a56a3fc]
>>>>
>>>> /lib64/libpython2.7.so.1.0(PyEval_EvalFrameEx+0x67bd)[0x7f5b9a56a57d]
>>>>
>>>> /lib64/libpython2.7.so.1.0(PyEval_EvalFrameEx+0x67bd)[0x7f5b9a56a57d]
>>>>
>>>> /lib64/libpython2.7.so.1.0(PyEval_EvalCodeEx+0x7ed)[0x7f5b9a56cefd]
>>>>
>>>> /lib64/libpython2.7.so.1.0(PyEval_EvalCode+0x32)[0x7f5b9a56d002]
>>>>
>>>> /lib64/libpython2.7.so.1.0(PyEval_EvalFrameEx+0x5513)[0x7f5b9a5692d3]
>>>>
>>>> /lib64/libpython2.7.so.1.0(PyEval_EvalCodeEx+0x7ed)[0x7f5b9a56cefd]
>>>>
>>>> /lib64/libpython2.7.so.1.0(PyEval_EvalFrameEx+0x663c)[0x7f5b9a56a3fc]
>>>>
>>>> /lib64/libpython2.7.so.1.0(PyEval_EvalCodeEx+0x7ed)[0x7f5b9a56cefd]
>>>>
>>>> /lib64/libpython2.7.so.1.0(PyEval_EvalCode+0x32)[0x7f5b9a56d002]
>>>>
>>>> /lib64/libpython2.7.so.1.0(+0x10043f)[0x7f5b9a58643f]
>>>>
>>>> /lib64/libpython2.7.so.1.0(PyRun_StringFlags+0x65)[0x7f5b9a5872a5]
>>>>
>>>> build/X86/gem5.fast(_Z6m5MainiPPc+0x5f)[0xad327f]
>>>>
>>>> build/X86/gem5.fast(main+0x33)[0x5ddf23]
>>>>
>>>> /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf5)[0x7f5b99008c05]
>>>>
>>>> build/X86/gem5.fast[0x5df8fc]
>>>>
>>>> --- END LIBC BACKTRACE ---
>>>>
>>>> Aborted (core dumped)
>>>>
>>>> the command is as simple as:
>>>>
>>>> build/X86/gem5.fast -d ~/tmp/output1/ configs/example/fs.py
>>>> --mem-size=2GB --disk-image=linux-x86.img --cpu-type=X86KvmCPU
>>>>
>>>> Any idea? thanks in advance.
>>>>
>>>> best,
>>>> Da
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> gem5-users mailing list
>>>> gem5-users@gem5.org
>>>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> gem5-users mailing list
>>> gem5-users@gem5.org
>>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> gem5-users mailing list
> gem5-users@gem5.org
> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
_______________________________________________
gem5-users mailing list
gem5-users@gem5.org
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users

Reply via email to