Hi Michail, I wouldn't advise going back. I think we fixed this (at least one path leading to this issue) in the following patch: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/19449
Please test it and let us know if your issue presists. Best, On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 11:18 AM Abhishek Singh < [email protected]> wrote: > > Try January 2018 commit > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 2:10 PM Michail Mavropoulos < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> I am using gem5 revision commit >> 4c38c7c02aca9922d7f30f2f399bbe94c034eb59. >> >> I try to run a full system emulation, after restoring from a checkpoint >> and using standard-switch option, in order to run over DerivO3CPU cpu >> model. >> >> I use the following command: >> ./build/X86/gem5.opt -d /tmp/gem5_test --stats-file=test.csv >> configs/example/fs.py --checkpoint-dir=/tmp/cpts/benchamark >> --checkpoint-restore=1 --caches --l2cache --maxinsts=3200000000 >> --standard-switch=3000000000 >> --kernel=/home/gem5/binaries/x86_64-vmlinux-2.6.22.9 >> --disk-image=/home/gem5/disks/ubuntu-14.04.img ; >> >> The result is that, there are some cases (different checkpoints/ >> benchmarks) where I get the following assertion: >> build/X86/mem/packet.hh:1094: T* Packet::getPtr() [with T = unsigned >> char]: Assertion `flags.isSet(STATIC_DATA|DYNAMIC_DATA)' failed. >> >> Is this a known issue? >> Should I modify the command above? >> >> Thank you >> _______________________________________________ >> gem5-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users > > _______________________________________________ > gem5-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users -- Pouya Fotouhi PhD Candidate Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of California, Davis
_______________________________________________ gem5-users mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
