Hi,

In my stat.txt file, I see that the miss latency given in cycles is almost
15 times greater than the total execution cycles of my gem5 run.

system.switch_cpus.numCycles              31316822936    # number of cpu
cycles simulated
system.l2.demand_miss_latency::switch_cpus.dtb.walker 476626107789 # number
of demand (read+write) miss cycles

These results are from simulating with TimingSimpleCPU. However, O3 CPU
also gives similar results.

Can someone please explain why the miss latencies are larger than the
number of execution cycles?

Thanks in advance,

Regards
Sethu
_______________________________________________
gem5-users mailing list
gem5-users@gem5.org
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users

Reply via email to