Hello, I would say overall DRAMSim3 is more accurate and to be honest it is much easier to use than DRAMSim2. I am also doing an evaluation on memory models between DRAMSim3 and gem5, based on the current results I would suggest you use either DRAMSim3 (using the temporary solution I proposed) or gem5 models.
Best Regards, On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 7:23 AM haurunis--- via gem5-users < gem5-users@gem5.org> wrote: > Hi Mahyar, > > Sorry to bother but I would like to ask a related question: > So for better DRAM power/timing simulation, will DRAMSim3 be the best > among DRAMCtrl (gem5-prebuilt) and DRAMSim2? The reason I am asking is that > I also tried to get DRAMSim2 to work in gem5. However, following the > /ext/DRAMSim2/readme, I kept running into > ```command line: build/X86/gem5.opt configs/example/se.py -c > tests/test-progs/hello/bin/x86/linux/hello --cpu-type=TraceCPU --caches > --l2cache --mem-type=dramsim2 > > Usage: se.py [options] > > se.py: error: option --mem-type: invalid choice: > ``` > _______________________________________________ > gem5-users mailing list -- gem5-users@gem5.org > To unsubscribe send an email to gem5-users-le...@gem5.org > %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s > -- Mahyar Samani (he/him/his) Electrical and Computer Engineering Department Research Assistant at *DArchR <https://arch.cs.ucdavis.edu/> (*2235 Kemper Hall) Secretary ECE-GSA Vice President Iranian Student Association at UC Davis University of California, Davis
_______________________________________________ gem5-users mailing list -- gem5-users@gem5.org To unsubscribe send an email to gem5-users-le...@gem5.org %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s
