Dear Dr. Jason

Thank you for your kind reply.
I think this worked fine with the older version of gem5, right?

Regards
Syam

On Fri, 24 Jun 2022, 12:43 am Jason Lowe-Power, <ja...@lowepower.com> wrote:

> Hi Syam,
>
> The error is that in *SE mode* you have to manually specify the PID for
> each process when you are creating the processes in Python. However, I
> think you're going to run into many problems trying to simulate such a
> large system/workload in SE mode. For instance, I seriously doubt 3GB is
> enough RAM for 64 copies of namd.
>
> We are working towards deprecating se/fs.py because they do not support
> the flexibility required for different kinds of simulations. I would
> suggest looking into extending the standard library with a new board to
> model your system. Right now, we don't have any prebuilt boards at this
> scale, but adding one is relatively straightforward. You can find
> documentation on the standard library on the website, in our recent ISCA
> tutorial (see our youtube channel), and we'll have more in a couple of
> weeks.
>
> Cheers,
> Jason
>
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 9:01 AM Syam Sankar <syam.sank...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all
>>
>>
>> I downloaded a new version of gem5 repo*(gem5 version 22.0.0.1)*
>> I could build it with the following command:
>>
>> *python3 `which scons` build/X86/gem5.fast RUBY=true
>> PROTOCOL=MESI_Two_Level  -j 8*
>>
>> I was trying to execute a *CPU2017 Benchmark* program on an 8X8 Core
>> system with the command as follows:
>>
>>
>> build/X86/gem5.fast configs/example/se.py  --num-cpus=64 --num-dirs=64
>>  --sys-clock=2GHz --topology=Mesh_XY --mesh-rows=8 --ruby --num-l2caches=64
>> --network=garnet   --caches --mem-type=DDR3_1600_8x8 --mem-size=3GB
>>  --routing-algorithm=1 -F 1000 -W 1000 -I 5000
>> --bench=namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd-namd
>>
>>
>>  But, the execution is ended with an error:
>>
>>
>> *build/X86/sim/process.cc:141: fatal: fatal condition !ret_pair.second
>> occurred: _pid 100 is already used*
>>
>> ...
>> ..
>> ..
>> build/X86/mem/dram_interface.cc:690: warn: DRAM device capacity (8192
>> Mbytes) does not match the address range assigned (64 Mbytes)
>> build/X86/mem/dram_interface.cc:690: warn: DRAM device capacity (8192
>> Mbytes) does not match the address range assigned (64 Mbytes)
>> build/X86/mem/dram_interface.cc:690: warn: DRAM device capacity (8192
>> Mbytes) does not match the address range assigned (64 Mbytes)
>> build/X86/mem/dram_interface.cc:690: warn: DRAM device capacity (8192
>> Mbytes) does not match the address range assigned (64 Mbytes)
>> build/X86/mem/dram_interface.cc:690: warn: DRAM device capacity (8192
>> Mbytes) does not match the address range assigned (64 Mbytes)
>> build/X86/mem/dram_interface.cc:690: warn: DRAM device capacity (8192
>> Mbytes) does not match the address range assigned (64 Mbytes)
>> build/X86/mem/dram_interface.cc:690: warn: DRAM device capacity (8192
>> Mbytes) does not match the address range assigned (64 Mbytes)
>> build/X86/mem/dram_interface.cc:690: warn: DRAM device capacity (8192
>> Mbytes) does not match the address range assigned (64 Mbytes)
>> build/X86/mem/dram_interface.cc:690: warn: DRAM device capacity (8192
>> Mbytes) does not match the address range assigned (64 Mbytes)
>> build/X86/mem/dram_interface.cc:690: warn: DRAM device capacity (8192
>> Mbytes) does not match the address range assigned (64 Mbytes)
>> build/X86/mem/dram_interface.cc:690: warn: DRAM device capacity (8192
>> Mbytes) does not match the address range assigned (64 Mbytes)
>> build/X86/mem/dram_interface.cc:690: warn: DRAM device capacity (8192
>> Mbytes) does not match the address range assigned (64 Mbytes)
>> build/X86/mem/dram_interface.cc:690: warn: DRAM device capacity (8192
>> Mbytes) does not match the address range assigned (64 Mbytes)
>> build/X86/mem/dram_interface.cc:690: warn: DRAM device capacity (8192
>> Mbytes) does not match the address range assigned (64 Mbytes)
>> build/X86/mem/dram_interface.cc:690: warn: DRAM device capacity (8192
>> Mbytes) does not match the address range assigned (64 Mbytes)
>> build/X86/mem/dram_interface.cc:690: warn: DRAM device capacity (8192
>> Mbytes) does not match the address range assigned (64 Mbytes)
>> build/X86/mem/dram_interface.cc:690: warn: DRAM device capacity (8192
>> Mbytes) does not match the address range assigned (64 Mbytes)
>> build/X86/mem/dram_interface.cc:690: warn: DRAM device capacity (8192
>> Mbytes) does not match the address range assigned (64 Mbytes)
>> build/X86/mem/dram_interface.cc:690: warn: DRAM device capacity (8192
>> Mbytes) does not match the address range assigned (64 Mbytes)
>> build/X86/mem/dram_interface.cc:690: warn: DRAM device capacity (8192
>> Mbytes) does not match the address range assigned (64 Mbytes)
>> build/X86/mem/dram_interface.cc:690: warn: DRAM device capacity (8192
>> Mbytes) does not match the address range assigned (64 Mbytes)
>> build/X86/mem/dram_interface.cc:690: warn: DRAM device capacity (8192
>> Mbytes) does not match the address range assigned (64 Mbytes)
>> build/X86/mem/dram_interface.cc:690: warn: DRAM device capacity (8192
>> Mbytes) does not match the address range assigned (64 Mbytes)
>> build/X86/mem/dram_interface.cc:690: warn: DRAM device capacity (8192
>> Mbytes) does not match the address range assigned (64 Mbytes)
>> build/X86/mem/dram_interface.cc:690: warn: DRAM device capacity (8192
>> Mbytes) does not match the address range assigned (64 Mbytes)
>> *build/X86/sim/process.cc:141: fatal: fatal condition !ret_pair.second
>> occurred: _pid 100 is already used*
>> Memory Usage: 3393456 KBytes
>>
>> *My machine:* *Ubuntu 20.04.4 LTS, [11th Gen Intel® Core™ i5-1135G7 @
>> 2.40GHz × 8]*
>>
>>
>> Please help to solve this issue
>>
>> Regards
>> Syam
>>
>> --
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gem5-users mailing list -- gem5-users@gem5.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to gem5-users-le...@gem5.org
>>
> _______________________________________________
> gem5-users mailing list -- gem5-users@gem5.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to gem5-users-le...@gem5.org
>
_______________________________________________
gem5-users mailing list -- gem5-users@gem5.org
To unsubscribe send an email to gem5-users-le...@gem5.org

Reply via email to