I don't believe so. I think you'll have to build them yourself. If you do, please share them with us so we can use them as well.
Nate > Yes I got this. Thanks for the tip Ali! Also, do we have all the binaries > for alpha/linux? The directory on /m5/dist/cpu2000 has only a few > benchmarks. > > - Sujay > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "nathan binkert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "M5 users mailing list" <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 12:06 AM > Subject: Re: [m5-users] Troubel running Spec2K > > > > Did you get this figured out? I understand the bug in M5 that allowed > > you to silently ignore this, but this is an error in your script as > > Ali pointed out. > > > > Nate > > > > On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Sujay Phadke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> Hello, > >> I am trying to get Spec2K to run. (beta 4 or 5) I have attached my > >> example config script here, which tries to run only the gzip_log > >> benchmark. > >> I get the following error: > >> > >> > ./build/ALPHA_SE/m5.opt configs/spec2000/test2.py -b gzip > >> > >> M5 compiled Feb 18 2008 17:51:36 > >> M5 started Mon Mar 24 15:16:41 2008 > >> M5 executing on vm1 > >> command line: ./build/ALPHA_SE/m5.opt configs/spec2000/test2.py -b gzip > >> Global frequency set at 1000000000000 ticks per second > >> warn: This DRAM module has not been tested with the new memory system at > >> all! > >> panic: only one workload allowed > >> @ cycle 0 > >> [create:build/ALPHA_SE/cpu/simple/atomic.cc, line 817] > >> Program aborted at cycle 0 > >> > > >> > >> It seems the workload is not being assigned correctly, but I am not able > >> to > >> figure out why. The line in atomic.cc which issues the panic is: > >> > >> #if FULL_SYSTEM > >> params->profile = profile; > >> params->do_quiesce = do_quiesce; > >> params->do_checkpoint_insts = do_checkpoint_insts; > >> params->do_statistics_insts = do_statistics_insts; > >> #else > >> if (workload.size() != 1) > >> panic("only one workload allowed"); > >> params->process = workload[0]; > >> #endif > >> > >> So maybe the workload.size() is not evaluating correctly. > >> > >> Can someone help me out? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Sujay > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> m5-users mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > m5-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > m5-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users > > _______________________________________________ m5-users mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
