As a more general concept, would it not be a useful concept to start building a "contributions" collection? I see quite a lot of questions on the list along the lines of I am trying to simulate configuration X where X is a slight variation on what others may be doing.
Benefits: * in the interests of science, better repeatability (someone claiming to have a better idea than published work can actually use it directly -- and check the results) * fewer questions like the above on the list Costs: * extra maintenance, possible to mitigate by making it clear that "contributions" are not maintained, and the original author should be asked questions on details On 8/19/08, richard strong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > HI all, > > I am wondering if anyone has tried to model a niagara processor in M5 > and would be willing to share their expertise on how to do so? This is > going to be used to validate a re-implementation of Wattch that I will > make available to all M5 users. > > Thanks in advance, > -Rick > > _______________________________________________ > m5-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users > -- Philip Machanick (Visiting Academic, School of ITEE, University of Queensland) 39 Cunningham Street, Taringa, Qld 4068, Australia http://opinion-nation.blogspot.com/ +61-7-3871-0963 (office 3365-1624) skype philipmach _______________________________________________ m5-users mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
