I thought that might be the case... it might even be that the modprobe
errors are from the kernel trying to load in the OSF/1 compatibility module.

Steve

On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Ali Saidi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> It is possible to run an osf/1 binary on linux, but you would need to
> compile a custom kernel with osf/1 syscall support.
>
> Ali
>
> On Oct 2, 2008, at 2:16 PM, Steve Reinhardt wrote:
>
> > You might be trying to run DEC OSF/1 binaries on Linux.
> >
> > Steve
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Hongbin Sun
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >               Can anyone tell me this problem has been fixed ? I am
> > facing the same problem as Tan did. When I run cpu2000 benchmarks on
> > FS mode,  m5 report :
> >
> >                modprobe: FATAL: Could not load /lib/modules/2.6.13/
> > modules.dep: No such file or directory
> >
> >                modprobe: FATAL: Could not load /lib/modules/2.6.13/
> > modules.dep: No such file or directory
> >
> >                bash: ./mcf00.peak.ev6: cannot execute binary file
> >
> >                then the simulation just ended.
> >
> >                Thanks a lot for taking your time!
> >
> >                Hongbin
> >
> >
> >
> > actually the entire command line output went like
> >
> > # ./twolf00.peak.ev6 test
> > modprobe: FATAL: Could not load /lib/modules/2.6.13/modules.dep: No
> > such file or directory
> >
> > modprobe: FATAL: Could not load /lib/modules/2.6.13/modules.dep: No
> > such file or directory
> >
> > bash: ./twolf00.peak.ev6: cannot execute binary file
> >
> > (sorry for not including the last line in my last email, my bad)
> >
> > so i think the benchmark was not executed. and besides, no output
> > file was produced. the name of the executable changed  since i
> > switched to the precompiled binary i downloaded off the Internet(so
> > the crosscompiler can't be the culprit).
> >
> > am i missing something? i mean, what i did basically was place the
> > binary and the input files in the image(latest-linux.img, the one
> > that came with the m5 distro), boot the simulator, and then run the
> > executable.
> >
> > is that the correct procedure  for running  benchmarks in FS mode?
> >
> > thanks a lot for taking time to answer my questions.
> >
> > Ali Saidi <saidi at umich.edu> wrote: That error shouldn't be a
> > problem. The benchmark is almost certainly still running, just some
> > syscall it did attempted to load a module, however that module isn't
> > necessary.
> > AliOn Oct 5, 2007, at 9:49 PM, w. tan wrote: i am trying to run
> > cpu2000 benchmarks in full system mode, and already compiled the
> > benchmarks using the crosscompiler. after copying the binaries to
> > the image i then tried running the benchmarks within the simulated
> > system. i got the error # ../TimberWolfSC stdcell modprobe: FATAL:
> > Could not load /lib/modules/2.6.13/modules.dep: No such file or
> > directory modprobe: FATAL: Could not load /lib/modules/2.6.13/
> > modules.dep: No such file or directory after looking around the net
> > for a while i came upon this message wherein steve advised another
> > user to have the benchmark(it was not exactly the same benchmark
> > though) statically linked to get around this. i then tried
> > statically linking twolf by adding "-static" to the makefile's
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > m5-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > m5-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> m5-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>
_______________________________________________
m5-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users

Reply via email to