Devraj Chapagain wrote:
> hi there,
>
> I am using 16 copies of SPEC CPU2006 benchmarks for simulation. While 
> simulating for small number of instructions, I got the result as:
>
> ===========================================================
> warn: Increasing stack size by one page.
> warn: Increasing stack size by one page.
> Exiting @ cycle 62736000 because all threads reached the max 
> instruction count
> ===========================================================
>  It seems correct, but the result is incomplete as some cores has void 
> or zero values for all the fields. For clarify, the values like 
> overall_miss_rate :  <err: div-0>. as some core has no reading values 
> (i.e., 0 on all). So, i could not determine the output of simulation.

This probably means that one (or more) of your cores was not running.
>
>
> When the number of instructions is increased, then i got the following 
> result:
> ===========================================================
> warn: Increasing stack size by one page.
> warn: Increasing stack size by one page.
> warn: Increasing stack size by one page.
> Exiting @ cycle 56291500 because target called exit()
> =============================================================

This implies that the target application (assuming you are in system 
emulation mode) called exit. Maybe the application finished?
> The simulation is exit after fixed number(56291500) of cycle whatever 
> be the size of physical memory is increased. Initially, i have 
> assigned 2GB of physical memory and when i got this result "Exiting @ 
> cycle 56291500" then i increase the physical memory to 10GB, then to 
> 20GB ..... 40GB but no effect. The simulation is exit after the same 
> number of cycle. After i got this, i checked the result but the result 
> is as on the previous, some core has assigned the values of reading, 
> while some of the cores have error like--> overall_miss_rate :  <err: 
> div-0>.
Is your scheduler assigning a thread to each core?  You might want to 
try Full System mode as you wont has the physical memory problem and can 
use traditional scripts.

>
> devraj
>  
>  
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> m5-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users

_______________________________________________
m5-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users

Reply via email to