Hi Steve

It would be a great help for me if you can provide me those patch about the
caches and also how to apply that patches so that I can continue my research
work without this interruption

Thanks
Ashutosh Jain

On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Steve Reinhardt <[email protected]> wrote:

> There are a number of bugs in the prefetcher currently... we received some
> patches from the list a while ago, and I have applied those patches and
> fixed several others in my internal tree, but haven't had the chance to push
> those to the public repository yet.  I'll try and put that higher on my
> to-do list.
>
> Steve
>
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Ashutosh Jain <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I am trying to run ghb prediction applied over L3 cache. While running the
>> simulation, I have following configuration on L3 cache which is depicted on
>> config.ini which I got after simulation.
>>
>> Part of config.ini  containing info for L3 cache where I have used
>> prefetch_policy to be ghb :::
>>
>> type=BaseCache
>> addr_range=0:18446744073709551615
>> assoc=16
>> block_size=64
>> cpu_side_filter_ranges=
>> hash_delay=1
>> latency=8000
>> lifo=false
>> max_miss_count=0
>> mem_side_filter_ranges=
>> mshrs=30
>> prefetch_access=false
>> prefetch_cache_check_push=true
>> prefetch_data_accesses_only=true
>> prefetch_degree=10
>> prefetch_latency=800000
>> prefetch_miss=true
>> prefetch_past_page=true
>> prefetch_policy=ghb
>> prefetch_serial_squash=true
>> prefetch_use_cpu_id=true
>> prefetcher_size=1000
>> prioritizeRequests=false
>> repl=Null
>> size=2097152
>> split=false
>> split_size=0
>> subblock_size=0
>> tgts_per_mshr=12
>> trace_addr=0
>> two_queue=false
>> write_buffers=8
>> cpu_side=system.tol3aBus.port[0]
>> mem_side=system.membus.port[1]
>>
>> I am getting the statistics for l3 cache overall miss rate. But the point
>> is its showing the same value unchanges on both the cases - when I have
>> applied ghb prefetch technique and and when I haven't applied any prediction
>> technique. I am in whimsical situation *why the two simulations(one with
>> prediction technique and other without the prediction technique) gives the
>> same value for l3 cache miss rate*......
>>
>>
>> Thanks is advance
>>
>> --
>> Ashutosh Jain
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> m5-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> m5-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>
_______________________________________________
m5-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users

Reply via email to