The short answer is "not really", but the long answer is that the kernel
is complaining that interrupts are enabled in run_posix_cpu_timers
which, a comment claims, is called from the timer interrupt handler. I
don't know if it's obvious or not since I don't know Alpha that well,
but it's determining they're enabled because getipl() is returning a
value that isn't equal to IPL_MAX. It could be that getipl is returning
the wrong value, or it could be that interrupts aren't being masked when
vectoring properly. It could also be that there's some code somewhere
that restores that ipl value and that its initial value isn't correct.
I've seen a number of cases in x86 where the hardware configuration at
the time Linux starts can make it crash or hang, usually having to do
with interrupts. I'd bet the timer interrupt has gone off a number of
times at that point in boot, so it's likely that there are a combination
of factors at work. It might be useful to look at older, working kernels
and see if they have that same check in them. It might also be
informative to set up a trace for this rdps() (which I assume reads some
register) getipl() uses to see if it behaves consistently or if it does
something odd the particular time the kernel panics.

Gabe

Steve Reinhardt wrote:
> I followed the directions here:
>
> http://m5sim.org/wiki/index.php/Using_linux-dist_to_Create_Disk_Images_and_Kernels_for_M5#Compiling_the_Kernel
>
> to build a new 2.6.27 kernel (which Ali pushed patches for) using a
> gcc-4.1.1 cross compiler.  The build goes smoothly, however, trying to
> boot this kernel via 'm5.opt configs/example/fs.py'gives the error
> below on the console.  This seems to happen whether or not I enable
> BIG_TSUNAMI and use tsb_osfpal.  Anyone have any ideas?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steve
>
> SMP: Total of 1 processors activated (4002.20 BogoMIPS).
> net_namespace: 552 bytes
> NET: Registered protocol family 16
> EISA bus registered
> pci: enabling save/restore of SRM state
> bus: 00 index 0 io port: [0, 1ffffff]
> bus: 00 index 1 mmio: [0, 3fffffff]
> Kernel bug at kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c:1327
> CPU 0 khelper(7): Kernel Bug 1
> pc = [<fffffc000035fbc0>]  ra = [<fffffc000034dc84>]  ps = 0000    Not
> tainted
> pc is at run_posix_cpu_timers+0xa30/0xa40
> ra is at update_process_times+0x84/0xb0
> v0 = 0000000000000000  t0 = fffffc0007057c00  t1 = fffffc000088d280
> t2 = 00000000000000c2  t3 = 0000000000010000  t4 = 0000000000000000
> t5 = fffffc00008412c8  t6 = 0000000000000005  t7 = fffffc0007054000
> a0 = fffffc000704d880  a1 = 0000000080000000  a2 = fffffc00009e3be0
> a3 = fffffc0007057ca0  a4 = 0000000000000000  a5 = 0000000000000000
> t8 = 0000000000000000  t9 = 0000000000000004  t10= 0000000000000000
> t11= fffffc00006d6a68  pv = fffffc000035f190  at = fffffc00009e3b80
> gp = fffffc000087de90  sp = fffffc0007057bc0
> Trace:
> [<fffffc000034dc84>] update_process_times+0x84/0xb0
> [<fffffc000031bbac>] smp_percpu_timer_interrupt+0x9c/0x100
> [<fffffc000031634c>] do_entInt+0x10c/0x2d0
> [<fffffc0000310d80>] ret_from_sys_call+0x0/0x10
> [<fffffc00006d6a68>] schedule+0x288/0x750
> [<fffffc0000356520>] __call_usermodehelper+0x60/0xd0
> [<fffffc0000356a30>] ____call_usermodehelper+0x0/0x1a0
> [<fffffc0000311120>] kernel_thread+0x10/0x90
> [<fffffc0000356d44>] run_workqueue+0x104/0x230
> [<fffffc00003564c0>] __call_usermodehelper+0x0/0xd0
> [<fffffc00003575a4>] worker_thread+0xb4/0x130
> [<fffffc000035de90>] cpu_clock_sample_group_locked+0xd0/0x1a0
> [<fffffc000035c684>] kthread+0x74/0xd0
> [<fffffc00003574f0>] worker_thread+0x0/0x130
> [<fffffc000035ce90>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x60
> [<fffffc0000311138>] kernel_thread+0x28/0x90
>
> Code: a42c02a8  20ec02a8  40e105a1  e43ffe52  c3ffff9a  00000081
> <0000052f> 0076e5b5
> Kernel panic - not syncing: Aiee, killing interrupt handler!
>
> (kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c:1327 looks like a simple assertion that
> interrupts are disabled)
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> m5-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users

_______________________________________________
m5-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users

Reply via email to