yes, for fast forwarding i am using simpoints.

On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Lisa Hsu <[email protected]> wrote:

> what are you doing with the simpoint?  fast forwarding to it?  a command
> line might be helpful.
>
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 2:42 AM, Pavan Kumar <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> hi steve.
>> i think there is effect because, every time i run simulation i check the
>> config.ini file. In config.ini under workload there is simpoint value. when
>> ever i run simulation i check config.ini to make sure what ever values i
>> used in configuration file is used by m5 or not.
>>
>> This is what i found in config.ini file and there is simpoint value in it,
>> so i am thinking it is using simpoint value.
>> [system.cpu.workload]
>> type=LiveProcess
>> cmd=/home/pavanj/linux-alpha-input/gcc/gcc_base.alpha.static
>> /home/pavanj/linux-alpha-input/gcc/expr2.i -o
>> /home/pavanj/linux-alpha-input/gcc/expr2.s
>> cwd=
>> egid=100
>> env=
>> errout=cerr
>> euid=100
>> executable=/home/pavanj/linux-alpha-input/gcc/gcc_base.alpha.static
>> gid=100
>> input=cin
>> max_stack_size=67108864
>> output=expr2.out
>> pid=100
>> ppid=99
>> simpoint=600000000   // so i am thinking m5 is using simpoint.
>> system=system
>> uid=100
>> 0
>>
>> Could please let me know is there any other way to find, what ever the
>> configuration i set is used by M5
>>
>>
>> thanks,
>> Pavan
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Steve Reinhardt <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> Is there any evidence that whatever you're doing to select a different
>>> simpoint is having any effect?  For example, does the simulator output
>>> differ at all?  My guess is that the option you're using doesn't do what you
>>> think it does.
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Pavan Kumar <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> hi,
>>>>
>>>> I am running spec cpu 2006(alpha) benchmarks on M5-2.0b6 for different
>>>> simpoints. Means, every time i increasing the simpoint by 100 Million.
>>>> for example;
>>>> *for 1 simulation*
>>>> i put the simpoint =6*100E6
>>>> i got the follwoing results.
>>>>
>>>>> system.cpu.dcache.ReadReq_accesses 22409799
>>>>> system.cpu.dcache.ReadReq_misses 970709
>>>>> system.cpu.dcache.WriteReq_accesses 9879012
>>>>> system.cpu.dcache.WriteReq_misses 197596
>>>>> system.cpu.dcache.overall_accesses 32288811
>>>>> system.cpu.dcache.overall_misses 1168305
>>>>> system.cpu.icache.ReadReq_accesses 100090404
>>>>> system.cpu.icache.ReadReq_misses 1305749
>>>>> system.cpu.icache.overall_accesses 100090404
>>>>> system.cpu.icache.overall_misses 1305749
>>>>> system.l2.ReadReq_accesses 2276458
>>>>> system.l2.ReadReq_misses 115852
>>>>> system.l2.overall_accesses 2397139
>>>>> system.l2.overall_misses 236533
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *for 2nd simulaltion*
>>>> i put the simpoint =7*100E6
>>>> i got the same as above
>>>>
>>>>> system.cpu.dcache.ReadReq_accesses 22409799
>>>>> system.cpu.dcache.ReadReq_misses 970709
>>>>> system.cpu.dcache.WriteReq_accesses 9879012
>>>>> system.cpu.dcache.WriteReq_misses 197596
>>>>> system.cpu.dcache.overall_accesses 32288811
>>>>> system.cpu.dcache.overall_misses 1168305
>>>>> system.cpu.icache.ReadReq_accesses 100090404
>>>>> system.cpu.icache.ReadReq_misses 1305749
>>>>> system.cpu.icache.overall_accesses 100090404
>>>>> system.cpu.icache.overall_misses 1305749
>>>>> system.l2.ReadReq_accesses 2276458
>>>>> system.l2.ReadReq_misses 115852
>>>>> system.l2.overall_accesses 2397139
>>>>> system.l2.overall_misses 236533
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I ran it for 8 more times by increasing simpoint value by 100 Million,
>>>> still all the results are same.
>>>>
>>>> I couldn't understand what could be the reason for getting the same
>>>> values for different simpoints.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> thanks,
>>>> pavan
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> m5-users mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> m5-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> m5-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> m5-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>
_______________________________________________
m5-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users

Reply via email to