Not everywhere, but most places. The bus uses the port interface directly without the SimpleTimingPort, however it doesn't derive from port. I'm not sure what a more detailed interface that derived from Port would look like. If you assume that the device that uses the SimpleTimingPort handles requests serially this model is fine, the only issue is when there is contention within a device. If you read the page on the wiki about the memory interface the port class provides primitives for a more detailed implementation.
Ali On May 31, 2009, at 7:07 PM, [email protected] wrote: > Hi, > > Is SimpleTimingPort used everywhere when sendTiming is required? is > there > any other derived class from port class which implements timing? It > seems > that this class uses recvAtomic to get an timing estimate and uses > this > estimate to schedule a response. So, how we can have more accurate > timing > model? Is there any available implementation now in M5? > > Thanks > > _______________________________________________ > m5-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users > _______________________________________________ m5-users mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
