Either InOrder or TimingCPU. O3 stands for out-of-order, so you definitely don't want that if you want an in-order core.
TimingCPU is a 1CPI machine that can be attached to a timing memory model. InOrder is new, and Korey can speak more to it, but I believe it is a mildly pipelined in-order CPU, more realistic than TimingCPU. However, I am not positive, nor do I know if it is really production ready - Korey? Lisa On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 9:21 AM, soumyaroop roy <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi there, > > To be able to perform a detailed timing on a CPU with an inorder execution > core, should I be using the DerivO3CPU model or the InOrderCPU model? > > regards, > Soumyaroop. > > -- > Soumyaroop Roy > Ph.D. Candidate > Department of Computer Science and Engineering > University of South Florida, Tampa > http://www.csee.usf.edu/~sroy <http://www.csee.usf.edu/%7Esroy> > _______________________________________________ > m5-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users >
_______________________________________________ m5-users mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
