Since no one more knowledgeable is going to  answer I'll take a  stab at it:

What is your max_insts = ?

<for the three cases?>

I had this problem and I found that if the Simpoint is greater than the 
max_insts, max_insts is reached before the Simpoint. Further, I should 
presume that max_insts should be the limit/end of what you are trying to 
sample so Simpoint is the start of your sample and max_insts is the or 
greater than the end of it.



Ashutosh Jain wrote:
> Hi 
>
> I am trying to simulate two experiments dealing with multi-core 
> multi-threaded system. Say case is 2 core X 2 thread. So there are 4 
> benchmarks used. I am using following SPEC CPU 2000 benchmarks: swim, 
> lucas, equake, fma3d. I have also setup the early simpoint values for 
> each for them ( 5, 35, 194, 298 respectively) . 
>
> Now I am running three simulations with max_insts_all_thread = 100M:
>
> case (0) when all benchmarks have simpoint values 0.
>
> case (1) When benchmarks are used in following order with their early 
> simpoint values
>
> system.cpu[0].workload = Benchmarks.SPECSWIM() (500,000,000), 
> Benchmarks.SPECFMA3D() (29,800,000,000)
> system.cpu[1].workload = Benchmarks.SPECEQUAKE()(19,400,000,000), 
> Benchmarks.SPECART() (3,500,000,000)
>
> case (2) When benchmarks are used in with their early simpoint values 
> while inter-changing the benchmarks for cpu [0].
>
> system.cpu[0].workload = Benchmarks.SPECFMA3D() (29,800,000,000), 
> Benchmarks.SPECSWIM() (500,000,000)
> system.cpu[1].workload = Benchmarks.SPECEQUAKE()(19,400,000,000), 
> Benchmarks.SPECART() (3,500,000,000)
>
> I have compared the simulations stats on m5stats file. The case (0) 
> and case (2) produces no differences in the statistics in the stats 
> file. But the case (1) produces the difference in the statistics. Why 
> this happens??
>
> Ashutosh Jain
>
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Shoaib Akram <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>     I guess if you go through the ASPLOS presentation, there are good
>     examples.
>
>     ---- Original message ----
>     >Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 10:43:14 -0400
>     >From: soumyaroop roy <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     >Subject: [m5-users] Workload Simpoint
>     >To: M5 users mailing list <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     >
>     >   How does the simpoint attribute work? Is it like
>     _______________________________________________
>     m5-users mailing list
>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> m5-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users

_______________________________________________
m5-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users

Reply via email to