Hi

Can you provide me the spec cpu 2006 binaries that I can try on the m5
(downloaded from the repository).


On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:12 AM, Ashutosh Jain <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi
>
> I have used those binaries on M5-2.0b6 I have from the download page, i.e
> not with the repository and not the updated one. On that particular case it
> had worked fine for me.
>
>
>  The output file is : "input.source.output"
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> spec_init
> Loading Input Data
> Duplicating 51763200 bytes
> Duplicating 103526400 bytes
> Duplicating 86548480 bytes
> Input data 293601280 bytes in length
> Compressing Input Data, level 5
> Compressed data 54403299 bytes in length
> Uncompressing Data
> Uncompressed data 293601280 bytes in length
> Uncompressed data compared correctly
> Compressing Input Data, level 7
> Compressed data 53599136 bytes in length
> Uncompressing Data
> Uncompressed data 293601280 bytes in length
> Uncompressed data compared correctly
> Compressing Input Data, level 9
> Compressed data 52960821 bytes in length
> Uncompressing Data
> Uncompressed data 293601280 bytes in length
> Uncompressed data compared correctly
> Tested 280MB buffer: OK!
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Steve Reinhardt <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> It's not clear what the problem is, but it might be something with the
>> binaries you've compiled.  What is the output of running 'file' on
>> your binary?
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 9:55 PM, Ashutosh Jain <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi
>> > I am getting the stack traceback as:
>> > ---------------------------------------------
>> > (gdb) where
>> > #0  ElfObject::tryFile (fna...@0x7fff537dcc40, fd=7, len=157111,
>> >     data=0x2b9dc366d000 "\177ELF\002\001\001")
>> >     at build/ALPHA_SE/base/loader/elf_object.cc:146
>> > #1  0x00000000006fcedb in createObjectFile (fna...@0x7fff537dcc40,
>> >     raw=false) at build/ALPHA_SE/base/loader/object_file.cc:141
>> > #2  0x00000000007558b5 in LiveProcess::create (params=0x99cde10)
>> >     at build/ALPHA_SE/sim/process.cc:655
>> > #3  0x000000000087a3ab in _wrap_LiveProcessParams_create (
>> >     args=<value optimized out>)
>> >     at build/ALPHA_SE/params/params_wrap.cc:24974
>> > #4  0x0000003ac00360f0 in PyObject_Call ()
>> >    from /usr/lib64/libpython2.4.so.1.0
>> > #5  0x0000003ac009352c in PyEval_EvalFrame ()
>> >    from /usr/lib64/libpython2.4.so.1.0
>> > #6  0x0000003ac0095fe5 in PyEval_EvalCodeEx ()
>> >    from /usr/lib64/libpython2.4.so.1.0
>> > #7  0x0000003ac009473f in PyEval_EvalFrame ()
>> >    from /usr/lib64/libpython2.4.so.1.0
>> > #8  0x0000003ac0094b66 in PyEval_EvalFrame ()
>> >    from /usr/lib64/libpython2.4.so.1.0
>> > #9  0x0000003ac0094b66 in PyEval_EvalFrame ()
>> >    from /usr/lib64/libpython2.4.so.1.0
>> > #10 0x0000003ac0094b66 in PyEval_EvalFrame ()
>> >    from /usr/lib64/libpython2.4.so.1.0
>> > #11 0x0000003ac0094b66 in PyEval_EvalFrame ()
>> >    from /usr/lib64/libpython2.4.so.1.0
>> > #12 0x0000003ac0094b66 in PyEval_EvalFrame ()
>> >    from /usr/lib64/libpython2.4.so.1.0
>> > #13 0x0000003ac0094b66 in PyEval_EvalFrame ()
>> >    from /usr/lib64/libpython2.4.so.1.0
>> > #14 0x0000003ac0094b66 in PyEval_EvalFrame ()
>> >    from /usr/lib64/libpython2.4.so.1.0
>> > #15 0x0000003ac0094b66 in PyEval_EvalFrame ()
>> >    from /usr/lib64/libpython2.4.so.1.0
>> > #16 0x0000003ac0094b66 in PyEval_EvalFrame ()
>> >    from /usr/lib64/libpython2.4.so.1.0
>> > #17 0x0000003ac0095fe5 in PyEval_EvalCodeEx ()
>> >    from /usr/lib64/libpython2.4.so.1.0
>> > #18 0x0000003ac0096032 in PyEval_EvalCode ()
>> >    from /usr/lib64/libpython2.4.so.1.0
>> > #19 0x0000003ac0095237 in PyEval_EvalFrame ()
>> >    from /usr/lib64/libpython2.4.so.1.0
>> > #20 0x0000003ac0095fe5 in PyEval_EvalCodeEx ()
>> >    from /usr/lib64/libpython2.4.so.1.0
>> > ---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit---
>> > #21 0x0000003ac009473f in PyEval_EvalFrame ()
>> >    from /usr/lib64/libpython2.4.so.1.0
>> > #22 0x0000003ac0095fe5 in PyEval_EvalCodeEx ()
>> >    from /usr/lib64/libpython2.4.so.1.0
>> > #23 0x0000003ac0096032 in PyEval_EvalCode ()
>> >    from /usr/lib64/libpython2.4.so.1.0
>> > #24 0x0000003ac00b2729 in ?? () from /usr/lib64/libpython2.4.so.1.0
>> > #25 0x000000000071e178 in m5Main (argc=<value optimized out>,
>> >     argv=<value optimized out>) at build/ALPHA_SE/sim/init.cc:194
>> > #26 0x00000000004089f2 in main (argc=2, argv=0x7fff537df798)
>> >     at build/ALPHA_SE/sim/main.cc:57
>> > --------------------------------------------------------------
>> > On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:35 PM, Steve Reinhardt <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Just run m5.debug under gdb, and when you hit the segfault, type
>> >> 'where' at the gdb prompt.
>> >>
>> >> On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 9:33 PM, Ashutosh Jain <[email protected]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Hi
>> >> > How can I do stack backtrace in M5?
>> >> >
>> >> > On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:32 PM, Steve Reinhardt <[email protected]>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> OK; can you provide a stack backtrace for the segfault?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Ashutosh Jain <[email protected]
>> >
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> > Hi
>> >> >> > Yes I have compiled the benchmarks and got the binaries..
>> >> >> > Ashutosh
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Steve Reinhardt <
>> [email protected]>
>> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> We'd need a stack backtrace from the segfault to begin to guess
>> >> >> >> what's
>> >> >> >> going on...
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Where did you get the binaries from?  Did you compile them
>> yourself?
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Steve
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Ashutosh Jain <
>> [email protected]>
>> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> > Hi
>> >> >> >> > I am working on the updated M5 from the repository. I would
>> like
>> >> >> >> > to
>> >> >> >> > run
>> >> >> >> > simulations with SPEC CPU 2006 benchmarks; but every
>> >> >> >> > time the simulation
>> >> >> >> > ends with segmentation fault. Is this the problem with M5 or
>> SPEC
>> >> >> >> > CPU
>> >> >> >> > 2006
>> >> >> >> > or am I missing something.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > Consider the case of benchmark bzip2. I have set it like:
>> >> >> >> > -------------------
>> >> >> >> > specbzip2 = os.path.join(test_base,
>> >> >> >> > '/home/ashutoshj/newm5/configs/cpu2006/speccpu2006/bzip2/')
>> >> >> >> > specbzip2out = os.path.join(test_base,
>> >> >> >> > '/home/ashutoshj/newm5/configs/cpu2006/speccpu2006/bzip2/')
>> >> >> >> > class SPECBZIP2(LiveProcess):
>> >> >> >> >     executable = os.path.join(specbzip2, 'bzip2_peak.alpha')
>> >> >> >> >     cmd = 'bzip2_peak.alpha input.source 280
>> >> >> >> >     output = os.path.join(specbzip2out, 'input.source.out')
>> >> >> >> > ---------------------------------
>> >> >> >> > And used in the se.py file. Then I ran the simulation it gives
>> the
>> >> >> >> > output
>> >> >> >> > as:
>> >> >> >> > ----------------------------------------------
>> >> >> >> > M5 Simulator System
>> >> >> >> > Copyright (c) 2001-2008
>> >> >> >> > The Regents of The University of Michigan
>> >> >> >> > All Rights Reserved
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > M5 compiled Mar 10 2010 06:42:32
>> >> >> >> > M5 revision 79463f723460+ 6018+ default tip
>> >> >> >> > M5 started Mar 21 2010 19:31:14
>> >> >> >> > M5 executing on leif.cs.lamar.edu
>> >> >> >> > command line: ../../build/ALPHA_SE/m5.opt -d
>> >> >> >> > cmp01_thds01_L2cache01
>> >> >> >> > cmp01_thds01_L2cache01.py --detailed --caches
>> >> >> >> > max_insts_all_threads = 100000
>> >> >> >> > SPECBZIP2()
>> >> >> >> > system.cpu[0].workload = Benchmarks.SPECBZIP2()
>> >> >> >> > Global frequency set at 1000000000000 ticks per second
>> >> >> >> > Segmentation fault
>> >> >> >> > ---------------------------------------------------
>> >> >> >> > Also all the SPEC CPU 2006 benchmarks with their inputs,
>> outputs,
>> >> >> >> > and
>> >> >> >> > executables in their respective directories are present at :
>> >> >> >> >             /home/ashutoshj/newm5/configs/cpu2006/speccpu2006/
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > With exactly the same configurations, SPEC CPU2000 gave me the
>> >> >> >> > desired
>> >> >> >> > expected results; So  I am unable to find a solution to this
>> >> >> >> > problem.
>> >> >> >> > Hoping to hear a solution
>> >> >> >> > --
>> >> >> >> > Ashutosh Jain
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> >> >> > m5-users mailing list
>> >> >> >> > [email protected]
>> >> >> >> > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >> >> m5-users mailing list
>> >> >> >> [email protected]
>> >> >> >> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > --
>> >> >> > Ashutosh Jain
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> >> > m5-users mailing list
>> >> >> > [email protected]
>> >> >> > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >> m5-users mailing list
>> >> >> [email protected]
>> >> >> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Ashutosh Jain
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > m5-users mailing list
>> >> > [email protected]
>> >> > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>> >> >
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> m5-users mailing list
>> >> [email protected]
>> >> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Ashutosh Jain
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > m5-users mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> m5-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Ashutosh Jain
>
>
>


-- 
Ashutosh Jain
_______________________________________________
m5-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users

Reply via email to