After doing some digging around it seems that it is working, however the PID
is unable to distinguish between multiple threads since they all give the
same value. What I want is the thread id. Do you think it is possible to get
this info in M5?

I was looking through the kernel and have no idea what Im doing.

Thanks




On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Ali Saidi <[email protected]> wrote:

> I don't think there is, but it's been unused for a while, so there could be
> some issues. Let us know what you find out.
>
> Thanks,
> Ali
>
> On May 24, 2010, at 9:03 PM, ef wrote:
>
> > Is there a bug in it? It is able to distinguish between different
> processes like Benchmark, RCS etc.. but every PID is the same. Im going to
> take a look into it.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > EF
> >
> > On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 8:32 PM, Ali Saidi <[email protected]> wrote:
> > If you look at src/arch/alpha/linux/system.cc there in a class called
> PrintThreadInfo. This pretty much does what you want assuming you're using
> our kernel or a kernel built from our patch queue. M5 sets an event on the
> kernel alpha_switch_to function and when that is executed it uses the kernel
> stack to figure out what the running process/tid is. You'll need to remove
> the false from the if statement that creates the event around line 139 for
> this to work.
> >
> > Ali
> >
> >
> >
> > On May 22, 2010, at 5:14 PM, ef wrote:
> >
> > > Any additional advice on being able to this is appreciated. Basically I
> want to have M5 be able to distinguish between threads not CPU. Since in
> PARSEC benchmarks, threads tend to move around between CPUs.
> > >
> > > On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Steve Reinhardt <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > There's nothing built-in for this that I know of.  The issue is that
> > > you're trying to detect an OS event... you could hook some action that
> > > the OS takes only when scheduling a new thread, like perhaps updating
> > > the page table base pointer or writing to the uniq register (via the
> > > wruniq instruction).  Someone like Nate or Ali who's done more
> > > hands-on low-level Alpha Linux work could provide better details I'm
> > > sure.
> > >
> > > Steve
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 9:15 PM, ef <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I was wondering if there is a way for m5 (not glibc or the kernel) to
> signal
> > > > when a new thread is on a cpu. I have some benchmarks that create new
> > > > threads in the middle of execution, and I would like to see output on
> them
> > > > being pinned to processors (I have more threads than processors, FS
> MODE). I
> > > > looked through and tested trace flags and I couldnt find anything. Is
> there
> > > > such flag?
> > > >
> > > > If not anyone know where I should implement a DPRINTF in m5 to do
> this?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > EF
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > m5-users mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > m5-users mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > m5-users mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > m5-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > m5-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> m5-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>
_______________________________________________
m5-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users

Reply via email to