Why do you want to fast-forward instead of taking checkpoints?
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Sujay Phadke <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for the suggestion Steve. I checked that out. however, if I dont > want to take any checkpoints, just fast-forward, then that doesnt work > out. I am trying to modify the condition that is checked when switching > into the timing/detailed mode to stall till all cores complete. > > On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 07:56 -0700, Steve Reinhardt wrote: >> Lisa's script to paste together multiple independent checkpoints into >> a multiprogrammed workload could be useful here... >> >> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Sujay Phadke <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hello, >> > I want to execute a multi-workload simulation consisting of >> > different workloads (only 1 thread/core) in SE mode. I want to >> > fast-forward each core to their individual simpoints and then stall till >> > all the other cores finish. I can't find a way to do this in the current >> > setup. has anybody worked on this? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Sujay >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > m5-users mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> m5-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users > > > _______________________________________________ > m5-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users > _______________________________________________ m5-users mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
