is it in run.py?

On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Steve Reinhardt <[email protected]> wrote:

> There should be another output file somewhere with program (not
> simulator) output, and there is probably an error message from the
> program there.
>
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 10:03 PM, biswabandan panda <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> >   this is what i am getting in 5 seconds
> > :
> >
> > command line: build/ALPHA_SE/m5.debug configs/splash2/run.py --rootdir
> > splash/splash2/codes -t --frequency 1GHz -n 4 --l1size 64kB --l2size
> 256kB
> > --l1latency 4ns --l2latency 11ns -b Cholesky
> > Global frequency set at 1000000000000 ticks per second
> > 0: system.remote_gdb.listener: listening for remote gdb #0 on port 7000
> > 0: system.remote_gdb.listener: listening for remote gdb #1 on port 7001
> > 0: system.remote_gdb.listener: listening for remote gdb #2 on port 7002
> > 0: system.remote_gdb.listener: listening for remote gdb #3 on port 7003
> > info: Entering event queue @ 0.  Starting simulation...
> > info: Increasing stack size by one page.
> > warn: ignoring syscall sigprocmask(18446744073709551615, 3, ...)
> > For more information see: http://www.m5sim.org/warn/5c5b547f
> > warn: ignoring syscall sigprocmask(0, 3, ...)
> > For more information see: http://www.m5sim.org/warn/5c5b547f
> > warn: ignoring syscall sigaction(4831387552, 8, ...)
> > For more information see: http://www.m5sim.org/warn/5c5b547f
> > warn: ignoring syscall sigaction(4831387552, 11, ...)
> > For more information see: http://www.m5sim.org/warn/5c5b547f
> > warn: ignoring syscall sigaction(4831387552, 10, ...)
> > For more information see: http://www.m5sim.org/warn/5c5b547f
> > warn: ignoring syscall sigaction(4831387552, 4, ...)
> > For more information see: http://www.m5sim.org/warn/5c5b547f
> > warn: ignoring syscall sigaction(4831387552, 7, ...)
> > For more information see: http://www.m5sim.org/warn/5c5b547f
> > warn: ignoring syscall sigaction(4831387552, 6, ...)
> > For more information see: http://www.m5sim.org/warn/5c5b547f
> > warn: ignoring syscall sigaction(4831387552, 12, ...)
> > For more information see: http://www.m5sim.org/warn/5c5b547f
> > warn: ignoring syscall sigaction(4831387552, 5, ...)
> > For more information see: http://www.m5sim.org/warn/5c5b547f
> > warn: ignoring syscall sigaction(4831387552, 13, ...)
> > For more information see: http://www.m5sim.org/warn/5c5b547f
> > Error opening file
> > warn: ignoring syscall sigprocmask(18446744073709547831, 1, ...)
> > For more information see: http://www.m5sim.org/warn/5c5b547f
> > hack: be nice to actually delete the event here
> > Exiting @ tick 1147337000 because target called exit()
> >
> > and in the stats file stats for one core only.
> >
> > thanks biswa
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Steve Reinhardt <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> If it's ending in 4 seconds, it's almost certainly ending with an
> >> error.  I'd think you'd end up with an error message somewhere (maybe
> >> in one of the output files).
> >>
> >> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 9:57 PM, biswabandan panda <[email protected]
> >
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > no its not doing for Cholesky,but its doing FMM and FFT,
> >> > is it the problem with binaries which prevent it for running  for long
> >> > time,actually it ends in 4 secs,but those FFT and FMM took around 15
> to
> >> > 20
> >> > mins.
> >> >
> >> > thanks
> >> > biswa
> >> > On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Steve Reinhardt <[email protected]>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Then my guess is that somehow the arguments that are supposed to tell
> >> >> the program that it should fork N-1 additional threads aren't getting
> >> >> passed successfully.  Try setting --trace-flag=SyscallVerbose and see
> >> >> if the program ever calls the thread fork syscall.  If it doesn't,
> >> >> then it's not trying to fork more threads.
> >> >>
> >> >> Steve
> >> >>
> >> >> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 9:39 PM, biswabandan panda
> >> >> <[email protected]>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> > hi,
> >> >> >     its running for single core.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Steve Reinhardt <
> [email protected]>
> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Is the benchmark running successfully on a single core, or is it
> not
> >> >> >> running at all?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 8:41 PM, biswabandan panda
> >> >> >> <[email protected]>
> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> > Hi all,
> >> >> >> >          i am still getting zeros all the cores  except one for
> >> >> >> > multicore
> >> >> >> > simulation with splash,some of the m5 users were getting the
> >> >> >> > result,i
> >> >> >> > do
> >> >> >> > not
> >> >> >> > know whats wrong with my m5,its latest beta 6 version
> only,splash
> >> >> >> > i
> >> >> >> > have
> >> >> >> > downloaded form m5 splashbenchmarks page.please suggest
> >> >> >> > something,i
> >> >> >> > tried
> >> >> >> > entire night yesterday,but its running for FMM,FFT only with
> full
> >> >> >> > stats
> >> >> >> > for
> >> >> >> > all cores.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > thanks
> >> >> >> > biswa
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> >> >> > m5-users mailing list
> >> >> >> > [email protected]
> >> >> >> > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> >> m5-users mailing list
> >> >> >> [email protected]
> >> >> >> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> >> > m5-users mailing list
> >> >> > [email protected]
> >> >> > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
> >> >> >
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> m5-users mailing list
> >> >> [email protected]
> >> >> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > m5-users mailing list
> >> > [email protected]
> >> > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
> >> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> m5-users mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > m5-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
> >
> _______________________________________________
> m5-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>
_______________________________________________
m5-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users

Reply via email to