In theory no, in practice, that depends. If your changed effected something else that means incorrect data is coming out of the cache then that's a problem.
Ali On Nov 5, 2010, at 8:29 PM, sheng qiu wrote: > Hi Ali Saidi, > > i just modified the original set indexing scheme with my own, in another > word, the blk maybe put into set 1 according to original address indexing, > now maybe put into set 1025. but i also modified the accessBlk, which will go > to set 1025 to check that blk when later referenced, and modified the > regenerateAddr() which will return the correct addr when called. Is this a > problem? > > Thanks, > Sheng > > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 1:11 PM, sheng qiu <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > i modified the lru.cc using some new replacement policy, and incurred this > error. does anyone know what may cause this happen? > > Thanks, > Sheng > > > > > > -- > Sheng Qiu > Texas A & M University > Room 302 Wisenbaker > email: [email protected] > College Station, TX 77843-3259 > _______________________________________________ > m5-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users _______________________________________________ m5-users mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
