What kernel are you using?

ali

On Jan 24, 2011, at 4:26 PM, Mario Donato Marino wrote:

> Yes, Ali you were right, I was using tsb_osfpal and not tl_osfpal.
> 
> With the a console and a tsb_osfpal version compiled by myself, using 2500MB 
> as the memory size (in Benchmarks.py), the simulation breaks here:
> 
> linux output:
> M5 console: m5AlphaAccess @ 0xFFFFFD0200000000
> Got Configuration 623
> memsize 9C400000 pages 4E200
> First free page after ROM 0xFFFFFC0000018000
> HWRPB 0xFFFFFC0000018000 l1pt 0xFFFFFC0000040000 l2pt 0xFFFFFC0000042000 
> l3pt_rpb 0xFFFFFC0000044000 l3pt_kernel 0xFFFFFC0000048000 l2reserv 
> 0xFFFFFC0000046000
> kstart = 0xFFFFFC0000310000, kend = 0xFFFFFC0000899860, kentry = 
> 0xFFFFFC0000310000, numCPUs = 0x2
> CPU Clock at 2000 MHz IntrClockFrequency=1024
> Booting with 2 processor(s)
> KSP: 0x20043FE8 PTBR 0x20
> KSP: 0x20043FE8 PTBR 0x20
> Console Callback at 0x0, fixup at 0x0, crb offset: 0x790
> Memory cluster 0 [0 - 392]
> Memory cluster 1 [392 - 319608]
> Initalizing mdt_bitmap addr 0xFFFFFC0000038000 mem_pages 4E200
> ConsoleDispatch at virt 100008D8 phys 188D8 val FFFFFC00000100A8
> Bootstraping CPU 1 with sp=0xFFFFFC0000076000
> unix_boot_mem ends at FFFFFC0000078000
> k_argc = 0
> jumping to kernel at 0xFFFFFC0000310000, (PCBB 0xFFFFFC0000018180 pfn 1101)
> 
> Memory size seems right.
> 
> Which M5 trace/code you suggest me to look at?
> 
>       Thanks!
> 
>       Mario
> 
> On Wed, 19 Jan 2011, Ali Saidi wrote:
> 
>> 
>> You should have a new tsb_osfpal and console. tl_osfpal is for a Alpha 
>> platform m5 no longer supports. How does it break?
>> 
>> Ali
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 13:52:34 -0500 (EST), Mario Donato Marino 
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Hey Ali, thanks for your reply!
>>> I've re-compiled and generate a new console binary, however the
>>> simulation breaks earlier than before (at least before, I was able to
>>> use it perfectly under 2GB). Maybe I'm missing something: should I
>>> also have tl_osfpal recompiled ? Are there any other binaries or
>>> modifications required to use more than 2GB?
>>> 
>>>     Thanks,
>>> 
>>>     Mario
>>> On Sun, 16 Jan 2011, Ali Saidi wrote:
>>>> If you compile the console binary yourself from the alpha-system 
>>>> repository you shouldn't have that problem anymore.
>>>> Ali
>>>> On Jan 15, 2011, at 4:22 PM, Mario Donato Marino wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>>   I was wondering what is the maximum memory size I can use in 
>>>>> Benchmarks.py. For example, when using up to 2GB everything works fine, 
>>>>> however if I  use 3GB, m5 simulation aborts and I get a couple messages 
>>>>> in the terminal file:
>>>>> memsize FFFFFFFFC0000000 pages FFFFFFFFFFFE0000
>>>>> setup: forcing memory size to 33554432K
>>>>> 
>>>>>   Can anybody give any hints on how to increase the maximum memory size?
>>>>> 
>>>>>   Thanks,
>>>>> 
>>>>>   Mario
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> m5-users mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> m5-users mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> m5-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> m5-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> m5-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
> 

_______________________________________________
m5-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users

Reply via email to