If you were using m5 recently you were already using gem5. The code is
the same.

Gabe

On 05/16/11 02:37, Hasina Khatoon wrote:
> I would like to know the benefits one can have by using Gem5 rather
> than m5. Everyone cannot afford to attend the tutorial as suggested in
> the mail.
>  
> I would like to coduct experiment on cache optimization techniques on
> multicore processors. would Gem5 be more suitable?
>  
> Thanks in advance
>  
> HK
>
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 1:52 AM, <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>     Send gem5-users mailing list submissions to
>            [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>
>     To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>            http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>     or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>            [email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>
>     You can reach the person managing the list at
>            [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>
>     When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>     than "Re: Contents of gem5-users digest..."
>
>
>     Today's Topics:
>
>       1. Mailing List Changes (Ali Saidi)
>       2. application seg faults with O3 (Gedare Bloom)
>       3. Re: application seg faults with O3 (Ali Saidi)
>       4. Are the Gem5 codes released? (huangyongbing)
>       5. how could I tie the DMA_controller to Ruby (xuewen zhou)
>       6. Re: Are the Gem5 codes released? (Meng Dong)
>       7. Re: Are the Gem5 codes released? (Gabe Black)
>
>
>     ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>     Message: 1
>     Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 17:00:29 -0500
>     From: Ali Saidi <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>,
>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>,
>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     Subject: [gem5-users] Mailing List Changes
>     Message-ID: <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>     Hi Everyone,
>
>     Over the past two years code from the GEMS simulator has been
>     integrated into the M5 simulator as part of a long term effort to
>     merge
>     the two simulators into one.  The new simulator will be known as
>     gem5, pronounced gem-five. It is the combination of tens of man
>     years worth of
>     effort from a combination of academic institutions and industry.
>     As part of the merging the simulators together their will be a
>     variety of changes to the simulator and m5 website in the coming
>     months to reflect the new branding. One of those changes is a
>     renaming of the mailing lists from m5-* to gem5-*, which has just
>     taken place. Aliases from the old names have been created to allow
>     for a seamless transition. As a reminder there are three mailing
>     lists for the gem5 simulator:
>
>     gem5-users: General discussion about gem5 and its use. (~3
>     messages/day)
>     gem5-dev:  Discussions of gem5 development, commit messages, and
>     code reviews (~7 messages/day)
>     gem5-announce: Major announcements about the gem5 simulator (~2
>     messages/year)
>
>     We will be holding a tutorial about gem5 at ISCA 2011 and
>     encourage you to attend. For more information on the tutorial
>     please see:  http://www.gem5.org/ISCA_2011_Tutorial
>
>     Thank you,
>
>     Ali
>
>     -------------- next part --------------
>     An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>     URL:
>     
> <http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/gem5-users/attachments/20110515/f5e0b8e2/attachment-0001.html>
>
>     ------------------------------
>
>     Message: 2
>     Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 20:03:26 -0400
>     From: Gedare Bloom <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     To: M5 users mailing list <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     Subject: [gem5-users] application seg faults with O3
>     Message-ID: <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
>     Hi,
>
>     I am trying to get some baseline runs to work in ARM_FS. I have
>     successfully built and run the ocean (contiguous) benchmark from
>     SPLASH-2 on ARM_FS with both simple and timing (-t with and without
>     --cache) CPU with default parameters using fs.py.  However, during a
>     run with detailed CPU (-d --caches), the ocean binary (not M5) seg
>     faults and control returns to the simulated system's shell. Does
>     anyone know some reasons that a program would crash with O3CPU but not
>     Atomic or Timing?
>
>
>     ------------------------------
>
>     Message: 3
>     Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 19:52:51 -0500
>     From: Ali Saidi <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     To: gem5 users mailing list <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     Subject: Re: [gem5-users] application seg faults with O3
>     Message-ID: <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>     Hi Gedare,
>
>     There are a few issues with the o3 cpu that will be fixed in the
>     next week or so.
>
>     Thanks,
>     Ali
>
>     On May 15, 2011, at 7:03 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>
>     > Hi,
>     >
>     > I am trying to get some baseline runs to work in ARM_FS. I have
>     > successfully built and run the ocean (contiguous) benchmark from
>     > SPLASH-2 on ARM_FS with both simple and timing (-t with and without
>     > --cache) CPU with default parameters using fs.py.  However, during a
>     > run with detailed CPU (-d --caches), the ocean binary (not M5) seg
>     > faults and control returns to the simulated system's shell. Does
>     > anyone know some reasons that a program would crash with O3CPU
>     but not
>     > Atomic or Timing?
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > gem5-users mailing list
>     > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>     >
>
>
>
>     ------------------------------
>
>     Message: 4
>     Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 08:58:51 +0800
>     From: "huangyongbing" <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     To: "gem5 users mailing list" <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     Subject: [gem5-users] Are the Gem5 codes released?
>     Message-ID: <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
>
>     Hi, all
>
>     I am confused whether the codes in gem5's website belong to gem5
>     or m5.
>
>
>
>     -Yongbing Huang
>     -------------- next part --------------
>     An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>     URL:
>     
> <http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/gem5-users/attachments/20110516/6dbf3e3e/attachment-0001.html>
>
>     ------------------------------
>
>     Message: 5
>     Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 15:56:29 +0800
>     From: xuewen zhou <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     To: M5 users mailing list <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     Subject: [gem5-users] how could I tie the DMA_controller to Ruby
>     Message-ID: <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
>
>     hello? everyone ?could someone tell me how could I tie the
>     DMA_controller to
>     the Ruby system ?thank you very much?
>
>     --
>     Xuewen Zhou  Master
>     Shanghai Jiaotong University
>     School of Microelectronics
>     National Engineering Laboratory For Automotive Electronic Control
>     Technology
>     800 Dongchuan Road, Shanghai 200240, P. R. China
>     Phone : 13062728106
>     -------------- next part --------------
>     An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>     URL:
>     
> <http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/gem5-users/attachments/20110516/e6dbdc6b/attachment-0001.html>
>
>     ------------------------------
>
>     Message: 6
>     Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 16:34:45 +0800
>     From: Meng Dong <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     To: gem5 users mailing list <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     Subject: Re: [gem5-users] Are the Gem5 codes released?
>     Message-ID: <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
>
>     I think it's still M5
>
>     ? 2011?5?16? ??8:58?huangyongbing <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>>???
>
>     >  Hi, all
>     >
>     > I am confused whether the codes in gem5's website belong to gem5
>     or m5.
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > -Yongbing Huang
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > gem5-users mailing list
>     > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>     >
>
>
>
>     --
>     Yours,Dongmeng
>     -------------- next part --------------
>     An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>     URL:
>     
> <http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/gem5-users/attachments/20110516/31b04777/attachment-0001.html>
>
>     ------------------------------
>
>     Message: 7
>     Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 04:51:59 -0400
>     From: Gabe Black <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     Subject: Re: [gem5-users] Are the Gem5 codes released?
>     Message-ID: <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
>
>     M5 is now part of the gem5 simulator along with GEMS. The gem5 website
>     is for gem5 which contains m5 and GEMS. We've been combining into gem5
>     for a long time, so the main difference from a few days ago is
>     that the
>     name changed. You'll still be able to get all the same code from the
>     same repositories. We're calling ourselves something different now
>     because we're not just M5 any more, but everything else is the same.
>
>     Gabe
>
>     On 05/16/11 04:34, Meng Dong wrote:
>     > I think it's still M5
>     >
>     > ? 2011?5?16? ??8:58?huangyongbing <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>     > <mailto:[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>>>? ??
>     >
>     >     Hi, all
>     >     I am confused whether the codes in gem5's website belong to gem5
>     >     or m5.
>     >     -Yongbing Huang
>     >
>     >     _______________________________________________
>     >     gem5-users mailing list
>     >     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     >     http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > --
>     > Yours,Dongmeng
>     >
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > gem5-users mailing list
>     > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>
>     -------------- next part --------------
>     An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>     URL:
>     
> <http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/gem5-users/attachments/20110516/581f074c/attachment.html>
>
>     ------------------------------
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     gem5-users mailing list
>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>
>     End of gem5-users Digest, Vol 58, Issue 33
>     ******************************************
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Department of Computer Science
> National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences (FAST-NU)
> Karachi Campus (Main)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gem5-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users

_______________________________________________
gem5-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users

Reply via email to