Thanks Andrew. Further discussion will take place in the bug. Regards, Glyn
On 22 Apr 2013, at 21:46, Andrew Clemons <[email protected]> wrote: > Glyn, > > On 2013-04-22 09:09:01 +0100, Glyn Normington wrote: >> Thanks for this Andrew. >> >> There is a design issue with multiple extenders competing to extend a >> particular application bundle. The OSGi Alliance is defining some >> standard generic capabilities that extenders can provide and >> applications can require so that an application can say that it needs >> a particular extender, although I'm not sure that much thought has >> been given to selecting between distinct implementations of the same >> extender standard. I'll mention this use case >> So your patch is probably a necessary evil. ;-) > > Great, thanks for that. > >> Please could you raise a bug and attach the patch. ChainActivator >> seems like a reasonable spot for the new logic. > > This is the ticket: > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=406255 > >> Your patch would also be useful in scenarios where Gemini Blueprint >> and Aries Blueprint need to co-exist, such as when running Aries >> Subsystems in Virgo ([1]). > > Just having a look at this now. > > _______________________________________________ > gemini-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gemini-dev _______________________________________________ gemini-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gemini-dev
