| Thanks Olaf.
Why do you prefer JaCoCo? I'm not averse to using it, but I'd like to understand.
Regards,
Glyn
Hi Glyn
I am about half way through all the testcases of the gemini core. I will
make the first commit once I am through with all of them to avoid
inhomogeneous testing state in a branch actively under development. However,
I just committed the POM with the new dependencies - I am quite sure these
shall suffice for the refactorings. Regarding test coverage: I found that an
old version of clover was once used to measure code coverage. It is my
intention to compare both coverage and execution time of the tests with the
initial test coverage figures to prevent a drop of test coverage - how about
switching to JaCoCo (http://www.eclemma.org/jacoco/)? The alternative could
be to request an open source license for clover from Atlassian, but I'd
prefer the former solution.
Regards,
Olaf
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:gemini-[email protected]]
On Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Dienstag, 7. Mai 2013 18:00
To: [email protected]
Subject: gemini-dev Digest, Vol 39, Issue 1
Send gemini-dev mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gemini-dev
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of gemini-dev digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Gemini Blueprint 2.0.0 schedule (Glyn Normington)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 10:18:16 +0100
From: Glyn Normington <[email protected]>
To: Gemini and sub-projects developer discussions
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [gemini-dev] Gemini Blueprint 2.0.0 schedule
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi Olaf
Any progress on this? The end of May isn't as far off as it was...
Regards,
Glyn
On 4 Apr 2013, at 21:41, Olaf Otto <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi all,
First of all, I'd like to say I'm happy to be on board soon. The
gemini-blueprint project is one of the most valuable open source additions
to the projects I'm involved with and I am looking forward to (hopefully)
help advancing it.
Regarding the test improvements: End of May 2013 seems feasible. Adding
new dependencies for testing is likely to be the first thing I'll do, thus
getting the CQs done timely should not be an issue. Presumably, those
dependencies are exclusively required for testing (i.e. "works-with" [1]).
I will soon proceed by posting an example of the test conventions and code
style I'd like to use to see if everyone agrees.
Regards,
Olaf
[1]
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/IP/Test_and_Build_Depend
encies
On 04/04/2013 06:00 PM, [email protected] wrote:
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 13:34:10 +0100
From: Glyn Normington <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected] developer discussions"
<[email protected]>
Subject: [gemini-dev] Gemini Blueprint 2.0.0 schedule
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I'm currently aiming for the end of June for Gemini Blueprint 2.0.0 ([1])
so that it is available to replace 2.0.0.M01 in the Virgo 3.7.0 line which
is also currently planned to ship in June.
Olaf Otto, who should become a GB committer within about a week, is
proposing some improvements to testing which may involve additional
dependencies and therefore CQs. I'd like to understand whether the
improvements can be made by, say, the end of May 2013 so that I can include
them in the 2.0 release. If not, I may go ahead and prepare the 2.0.0
docuware now and we can add the new test stuff in 2.1.0.
Olaf: would you care to comment please?
Regards,
Glyn
[1] http://projects.eclipse.org/projects/rt.gemini.blueprint
-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was
scrubbed...
URL:
<https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/gemini-dev/attachments/20130
404/02306ba1/attachment.html>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
gemini-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gemini-dev
_______________________________________________
gemini-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gemini-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/gemini-dev/attachments/20130507/60b
4c4a1/attachment.html>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
gemini-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gemini-dev
End of gemini-dev Digest, Vol 39, Issue 1
*****************************************
_______________________________________________
gemini-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gemini-dev
|
