Eek! This is a typo. The second 'provisional' should be 'permanent'. It's trying to say that IANA should do what the Expert recommends.
> I had reviewed version 05 of this draft and chatted with the authors on a > couple of points, so "no objection to publication as a BCP", > but there's one incoherent part, at the top of page 10: > > 5. If Expert Review recommends registration 'provisional' or > 'provisional' registration, IANA adds the registration to the > appropriate registry. > > What was this actually saying? I can't begin to guess... _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
